Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Other small states
Other small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 83.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Other small states, 1988–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Other small states stood at 83.56 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 34 years on record.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 99.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Other small states peaked at 83.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0882 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1990.
That places Other small states 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Other small states, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0.1323 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 0.0882 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1991 | 7.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +7850.0% |
| 1992 | 5.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1993 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1994 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1995 | 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 1996 | 4.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 1997 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1998 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.6% |
| 1999 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.7% |
| 2000 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2001 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.9% |
| 2002 | 8.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +217.4% |
| 2003 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.8% |
| 2004 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 2005 | 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +282.6% |
| 2006 | 6.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.2% |
| 2007 | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.0% |
| 2008 | 14.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2009 | 9.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.2% |
| 2010 | 12.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 2011 | 37.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +193.5% |
| 2012 | 41.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2013 | 20.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.8% |
| 2014 | 23.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2015 | 42.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.7% |
| 2016 | 53.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 2017 | 52.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2018 | 38.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 2019 | 67.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 2020 | 67.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 83.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 2022 | 83.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1323 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1323 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1323 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1990s | 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0882 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 39.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 67.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 78.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 67.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 83.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Other small states
- 1 Tuvalu 55,055 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Naoero 12,590 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Marshall Islands 3,955 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 El Salvador 3,563 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Kiribati 2,463 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Bangladesh 1,522 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Other small states
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 2.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 110,000 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 11.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 172.17 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 5.22 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 85.69 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 223.35 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 24.32 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 4.79 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.96 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Other small states?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Other small states was 83.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Other small states?
- The highest recorded value was 83.56 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Other small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0882 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- How does Other small states rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Other small states ranks 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Other small states?
- Over the last ten years it is up 99.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Other small states data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.