Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Small states
Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 49.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Small states, 1988–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Small states is 49.41 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.7% on the previous year and up 119.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Small states peaked at 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0291 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1989.
That places Small states 6th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Small states, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0.0436 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.0291 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1990 | 0.1889 current US$ per square kilometre | +550.0% |
| 1991 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +2564.0% |
| 1992 | 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1993 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1994 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1995 | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 1996 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1997 | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1998 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 1999 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2000 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2001 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 2002 | 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +233.3% |
| 2003 | 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 2004 | 3.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.4% |
| 2005 | 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.4% |
| 2006 | 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2007 | 12.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.1% |
| 2008 | 10.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2009 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 2010 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2011 | 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.7% |
| 2012 | 22.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2013 | 15.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2014 | 16.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2015 | 25.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.8% |
| 2016 | 30.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 2017 | 34.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2018 | 33.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2019 | 43.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 2020 | 44.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2022 | 49.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0363 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0291 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0436 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1990s | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1889 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 24.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 48.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Small states
- 3 Marshall Islands 3,955 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 El Salvador 3,563 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Kiribati 2,463 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Bangladesh 1,522 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Grenada 1,368 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Palau 1,108 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Rwanda 1,037 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Small states
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.22 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 470,000 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 42.93 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 239.53 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 5.86 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 93.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 265.88 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 33.07 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 6.72 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 355.78 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Small states?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Small states was 49.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Small states?
- The highest recorded value was 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0291 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does Small states rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Small states ranks 6th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Small states?
- Over the last ten years it is up 119.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Small states data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.