Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was -4.73 % change on previous year in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Guatemala, 1972–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Guatemala recorded -4.73 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 114.6% on the previous year and up 81.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Guatemala peaked at 872.22 % change on previous year in 1976 and was at its lowest, -100 % change on previous year, in 2015.
That places Guatemala 73rd out of 156 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1974 | 60 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 125 % change on previous year | +108.3% |
| 1976 | 872.22 % change on previous year | +597.8% |
| 1977 | -0.5714 % change on previous year | -100.1% |
| 1978 | -57.47 % change on previous year | +9957.5% |
| 1979 | 64.86 % change on previous year | -212.9% |
| 1980 | 35.25 % change on previous year | -45.7% |
| 1981 | -6.67 % change on previous year | -118.9% |
| 1982 | -11.04 % change on previous year | +65.6% |
| 1983 | -36.5 % change on previous year | +230.6% |
| 1984 | 32.18 % change on previous year | -188.2% |
| 1985 | 68.7 % change on previous year | +113.4% |
| 1986 | 1.03 % change on previous year | -98.5% |
| 1987 | 31.63 % change on previous year | +2968.4% |
| 1988 | 161.24 % change on previous year | +409.7% |
| 1989 | 8.75 % change on previous year | -94.6% |
| 1990 | 51.3 % change on previous year | +486.0% |
| 1991 | -34.08 % change on previous year | -166.4% |
| 1992 | 18.06 % change on previous year | -153.0% |
| 1993 | 37.78 % change on previous year | +109.2% |
| 1994 | -44.83 % change on previous year | -218.7% |
| 1995 | 105.03 % change on previous year | -334.3% |
| 1996 | -8.85 % change on previous year | -108.4% |
| 1997 | 34.67 % change on previous year | -491.8% |
| 1998 | 29.32 % change on previous year | -15.4% |
| 1999 | -38.45 % change on previous year | -231.2% |
| 2000 | -19.71 % change on previous year | -48.7% |
| 2001 | 100.47 % change on previous year | -609.7% |
| 2002 | -2.41 % change on previous year | -102.4% |
| 2003 | -17.73 % change on previous year | +635.4% |
| 2004 | 23.2 % change on previous year | -230.9% |
| 2005 | 26.29 % change on previous year | +13.3% |
| 2006 | -24.3 % change on previous year | -192.4% |
| 2007 | 26.1 % change on previous year | -207.4% |
| 2008 | 8.72 % change on previous year | -66.6% |
| 2009 | 3.39 % change on previous year | -61.1% |
| 2010 | -26.14 % change on previous year | -870.6% |
| 2011 | -11.32 % change on previous year | -56.7% |
| 2012 | -65.69 % change on previous year | +480.4% |
| 2013 | -54.2 % change on previous year | -17.5% |
| 2014 | -96.95 % change on previous year | +78.9% |
| 2015 | -100 % change on previous year | +3.1% |
| 2017 | -48.14 % change on previous year | -51.9% |
| 2018 | -64.68 % change on previous year | +34.4% |
| 2019 | 32.48 % change on previous year | -150.2% |
| 2020 | -4.73 % change on previous year | -114.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 136.13 % change on previous year | -57.47 % change on previous year | 872.22 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1980s | 28.46 % change on previous year | -36.5 % change on previous year | 161.24 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.99 % change on previous year | -44.83 % change on previous year | 105.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.4 % change on previous year | -24.3 % change on previous year | 100.47 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -48.29 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 32.48 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2020s | -4.73 % change on previous year | -4.73 % change on previous year | -4.73 % change on previous year | 1 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 70 Georgia -1.98 % change on previous year compare
- 71 Jamaica -2.82 % change on previous year compare
- 72 Mongolia -4.64 % change on previous year compare
- 74 North Korea -5.12 % change on previous year compare
- 75 Lao People's Democratic Republic -5.23 % change on previous year compare
- 76 Sri Lanka -6.05 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Guatemala was -4.73 % change on previous year in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 872.22 % change on previous year in 1976.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was -100 % change on previous year in 2015.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Guatemala ranks 73rd out of 156 countries with data for 2020.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 81.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.