Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Other small states

Other small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 260 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
260 % change on previous year
Rank
3rd
of 46 groups
All-time high
260 % change on previous year
in 2022
All-time low
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Years of data
50
1971–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Other small states, 1971–2022

-1000100200300197119962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Other small states stood at 260 % change on previous year. That is the highest value across all 50 years on record.

The figure is up 518.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Other small states peaked at 260 % change on previous year in 2022 and was at its lowest, -100 % change on previous year, in 2015.

Other small states ranks 3rd of 46 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Other small states, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), annual growth rate in Other small states, 1971 to 2022.
Year % change on previous year Change
1971 215 % change on previous year
1972 -31.75 % change on previous year -114.8%
1973 81.4 % change on previous year -356.4%
1974 166.67 % change on previous year +104.8%
1975 24.52 % change on previous year -85.3%
1976 123.17 % change on previous year +402.3%
1977 83.56 % change on previous year -32.2%
1978 47.5 % change on previous year -43.2%
1979 50.93 % change on previous year +7.2%
1980 57.16 % change on previous year +12.2%
1981 -17.51 % change on previous year -130.6%
1982 -37.39 % change on previous year +113.5%
1983 12.62 % change on previous year -133.8%
1984 0.6948 % change on previous year -94.5%
1985 -29.44 % change on previous year -4337.2%
1986 83.44 % change on previous year -383.4%
1987 2.84 % change on previous year -96.6%
1988 12.96 % change on previous year +355.8%
1989 -0.4589 % change on previous year -103.5%
1990 -3.29 % change on previous year +616.6%
1991 -27.45 % change on previous year +734.9%
1992 29.43 % change on previous year -207.2%
1993 2.88 % change on previous year -90.2%
1994 11.51 % change on previous year +300.3%
1995 30.15 % change on previous year +161.9%
1996 -6.57 % change on previous year -121.8%
1997 -6.79 % change on previous year +3.3%
1998 -6.4 % change on previous year -5.7%
1999 -31.01 % change on previous year +384.3%
2000 2.34 % change on previous year -107.5%
2001 41.98 % change on previous year +1695.9%
2002 -43.94 % change on previous year -204.7%
2003 19.94 % change on previous year -145.4%
2004 40.43 % change on previous year +102.7%
2005 -15.42 % change on previous year -138.1%
2006 -35.78 % change on previous year +132.0%
2007 67.98 % change on previous year -290.0%
2008 -18.45 % change on previous year -127.1%
2009 -49.31 % change on previous year +167.3%
2010 -26.25 % change on previous year -46.8%
2011 -9.19 % change on previous year -65.0%
2012 -62.09 % change on previous year +575.9%
2013 -64.72 % change on previous year +4.2%
2014 40.87 % change on previous year -163.1%
2015 -100 % change on previous year -344.7%
2018 3.57 % change on previous year -103.6%
2019 -41.38 % change on previous year -1258.6%
2020 -70.59 % change on previous year +70.6%
2021 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2022 260 % change on previous year

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 84.55 % change on previous year -31.75 % change on previous year 215 % change on previous year 9
1980s 8.49 % change on previous year -37.39 % change on previous year 83.44 % change on previous year 10
1990s -0.7546 % change on previous year -31.01 % change on previous year 30.15 % change on previous year 10
2000s 0.9779 % change on previous year -49.31 % change on previous year 67.98 % change on previous year 10
2010s -32.4 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 40.87 % change on previous year 8
2020s 63.14 % change on previous year -70.59 % change on previous year 260 % change on previous year 3

Countries ranked near Other small states

  1. 1 Dominican Republic 898.54 % change on previous year compare
  2. 2 Myanmar 549.17 % change on previous year compare
  3. 3 Türkiye 399.32 % change on previous year compare
  4. 4 Suriname 393.52 % change on previous year compare
  5. 5 Iran 377.1 % change on previous year compare
  6. 6 El Salvador 293.32 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 202 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Other small states

All data for Other small states →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Other small states?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Other small states was 260 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Other small states?
The highest recorded value was 260 % change on previous year in 2022.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Other small states?
The lowest recorded value was -100 % change on previous year in 2015.
How does Other small states rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Other small states ranks 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Other small states?
Over the last ten years it is up 518.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Other small states data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Other small states. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-annual-growth-rate/other-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-annual-growth-rate/other-small-states/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Other small states</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.