Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Congo
Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Congo, 1971–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Congo recorded 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023.
That represents a change of up 151.3% on the previous year and up 4,063.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Congo peaked at 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2017.
Congo ranks 88th of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Congo, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0.1171 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.3% |
| 1973 | 0.1171 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0878 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1975 | 0.1757 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1976 | 0.2343 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1977 | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +1775.0% |
| 1978 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.3% |
| 1979 | 0.937 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1980 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.1% |
| 1981 | 0.3221 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.6% |
| 1982 | 0.4978 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 1983 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +270.6% |
| 1984 | 0.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.8% |
| 1985 | 0.1171 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 1986 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +825.0% |
| 1987 | 0.7321 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.4% |
| 1988 | 8.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +1092.0% |
| 1989 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.6% |
| 1990 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1991 | 0.4978 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.5% |
| 1992 | 0.1757 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.7% |
| 1993 | 0.1171 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1994 | 0.1757 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1995 | 0.1464 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1996 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +4540.0% |
| 1997 | 0.7028 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.7% |
| 1998 | 0.205 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.8% |
| 1999 | 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +4042.9% |
| 2001 | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 2002 | 0.5271 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.4% |
| 2003 | 8.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +1422.2% |
| 2004 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.3% |
| 2005 | 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +375.0% |
| 2006 | 0.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.5% |
| 2018 | 0.6394 current US$ per square kilometre | +908.9% |
| 2019 | 0.7088 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2020 | 0.1787 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.8% |
| 2021 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +758.4% |
| 2022 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 2023 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0878 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1980s | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1171 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1171 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.4705 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7088 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 2020s | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1787 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 85 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Lesotho 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Sudan 2.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 89 Philippines 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Eswatini 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 18,209 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 891,418 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.80 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 542,370 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 677,421 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 96.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42,394 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.01 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Congo?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Congo was 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0634 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Congo rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Congo ranks 88th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4,063.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.