Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square in North Korea
North Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square was 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in North Korea, 1988–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2019, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in North Korea stood at 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 30 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.1% on the previous year and down 97.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in North Korea peaked at 10.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2019.
North Korea ranks 119th of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square in North Korea, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1990 | 5.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1991 | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 1992 | 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.3% |
| 1993 | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.8% |
| 1994 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1995 | 0.9966 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 1996 | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +350.0% |
| 1997 | 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.3% |
| 1998 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.4% |
| 1999 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2000 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2001 | 0.7474 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.1% |
| 2002 | 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +566.7% |
| 2003 | 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.3% |
| 2004 | 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 2005 | 5.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2006 | 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2007 | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2008 | 8.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 2009 | 10.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2010 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.4% |
| 2011 | 0.8305 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2012 | 0.8574 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.2514 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.7% |
| 2016 | 0.2758 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2017 | 0.2329 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 2018 | 0.245 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
North Korea compared with similar countries
- North Korea's 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for low income countries, which is 12.94 current US$ per square kilometre, 2% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- North Korea's 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre, 17% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square in North Korea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +566.7% | 0.7474 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1996 | +350.0% | 0.9966 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1990s | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9966 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7474 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5006 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near North Korea
- 116 South Africa 0.3291 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 117 Ecuador 0.2895 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Cote d'Ivoire 0.2723 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Iran 0.2022 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 121 Mongolia 0.1975 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Uruguay 0.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for North Korea
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 26,363 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 999 current US$ (2015)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.27 million current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 452,292 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 556,002 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 199,133 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 803,033 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 185,326 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 21,444 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 416,108 current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in North Korea?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in North Korea was 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in North Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 10.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in North Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2324 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- How does North Korea rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- North Korea ranks 119th out of 160 countries with data for 2019.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in North Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 97.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this North Korea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.