Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 62.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
62.34 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 16.2%
Rank
1st
of 44 groups
All-time high
67.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
0.2214 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1963
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Low & middle income recorded 62.34 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023.
The figure is up 16.2% on the previous year and up 36.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Low & middle income peaked at 67.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.2214 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1963.
That places Low & middle income 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.4322 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6668 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.3% |
| 1963 | 0.2214 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.8% |
| 1964 | 0.2924 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1965 | 0.5852 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.1% |
| 1967 | 0.9103 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1968 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1969 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1970 | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.7% |
| 1971 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1972 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1973 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1974 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.9% |
| 1975 | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1976 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.6% |
| 1977 | 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1978 | 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1979 | 14.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 1980 | 17.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1981 | 16.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1982 | 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1983 | 11.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1984 | 12.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1985 | 10.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1986 | 16.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 1987 | 20.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1988 | 21.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1989 | 21.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1990 | 26.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1991 | 24.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1992 | 24.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1993 | 23 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1994 | 22 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1995 | 29.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 1996 | 29.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1997 | 27.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1998 | 27.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1999 | 28.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2000 | 29.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2001 | 28.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2002 | 31.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2003 | 36.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2004 | 34.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2005 | 48.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 2006 | 56.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2007 | 60.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2008 | 67.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2009 | 62.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2010 | 63.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 56.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2012 | 48.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 45.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2014 | 50.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2015 | 52.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2016 | 39.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2017 | 44.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2018 | 47.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2019 | 42.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2020 | 45.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2021 | 47.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2022 | 53.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2023 | 62.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6837 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2214 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 26.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 22 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 45.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 67.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 49 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 63.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 52.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Low & middle income was 62.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 67.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2214 current US$ per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Low & middle income ranks 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.