Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Malawi
Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 0.0561 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Malawi, 1970–2013
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Malawi recorded 0.0561 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 44 years on record.
That represents a change of down 83.0% on the previous year and down 99.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Malawi peaked at 205.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0561 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2013.
Malawi ranks 141st of 160 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Malawi, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.2% |
| 1972 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.3% |
| 1973 | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.7% |
| 1974 | 12.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 1975 | 13.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1976 | 34.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 1977 | 29.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1978 | 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1979 | 47.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.5% |
| 1980 | 74.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.3% |
| 1981 | 26.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.8% |
| 1982 | 26.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1983 | 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1984 | 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 1985 | 27.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.7% |
| 1986 | 59.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.2% |
| 1987 | 114.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.9% |
| 1988 | 114.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1989 | 88.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1990 | 104.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1991 | 64.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 1992 | 109.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.7% |
| 1993 | 25.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.4% |
| 1994 | 39.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.3% |
| 1995 | 92.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +135.1% |
| 1996 | 107.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1997 | 131.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1998 | 48.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.9% |
| 1999 | 73.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 2000 | 16.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.0% |
| 2001 | 138.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +716.9% |
| 2002 | 178.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.0% |
| 2003 | 77.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.5% |
| 2004 | 167.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.0% |
| 2005 | 205.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2006 | 110.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.2% |
| 2007 | 72.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 2008 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.1% |
| 2009 | 9.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +561.5% |
| 2010 | 0.2121 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.7% |
| 2011 | 0.3182 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2012 | 0.3292 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0561 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 17.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 57.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 114.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 79.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 131.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 97.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 205.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2289 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0561 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3292 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Malawi
- 138 Uzbekistan 0.0918 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Paraguay 0.078 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 140 Argentina 0.0665 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 142 Guyana 0.0508 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 143 Papua New Guinea 0.0442 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 144 Brazil 0.0329 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Malawi
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 239,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 9.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 152.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 61.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 40.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 43.98 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Malawi?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Malawi was 0.0561 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Malawi?
- The highest recorded value was 205.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Malawi?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0561 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- How does Malawi rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Malawi ranks 141st out of 160 countries with data for 2013.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Malawi?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malawi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.