Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Serbia
Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Serbia, 2006–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Serbia stood at 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.7% on the previous year and up 649.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Serbia peaked at 243.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.399 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2012.
Serbia ranks 83rd of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Serbia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 243.54 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 35.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.4% |
| 2008 | 69.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.9% |
| 2009 | 29.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.8% |
| 2010 | 43.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 2011 | 15.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.1% |
| 2012 | 0.399 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.4% |
| 2016 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +218.9% |
| 2017 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.4% |
| 2020 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2021 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2022 | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.7% |
| 2023 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 243.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2010s | 9.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.399 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2020s | 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 80 Poland 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre
- 81 Albania 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 82 Montenegro 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 84 Timor-Leste 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 85 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Lesotho 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Serbia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 343,039 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 134,406 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 454.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 27.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 57.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 167.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 828,015 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -11.46 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Serbia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Serbia was 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 243.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.399 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Serbia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Serbia ranks 83rd out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 649.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.