Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Suriname
Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
33.17 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 393.5%
World rank
36th
of 160 countries
All-time high
772.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
All-time low
1.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
Years of data
61
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Suriname, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Suriname recorded 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023.
The figure is up 393.5% on the previous year and up 66.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Suriname peaked at 772.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2003.
Suriname ranks 36th of 160 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Suriname, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 64.17 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 55.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1963 | 80.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.7% |
| 1964 | 71.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1965 | 76.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1968 | 78.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1969 | 92.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1970 | 140.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.3% |
| 1971 | 154.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1972 | 187.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 1973 | 149.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1974 | 264.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.3% |
| 1975 | 294.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1976 | 627.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.0% |
| 1977 | 540.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1978 | 383.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.1% |
| 1979 | 558.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.7% |
| 1980 | 471.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1981 | 580.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 1982 | 606.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1983 | 19.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.8% |
| 1984 | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.2% |
| 1985 | 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1986 | 11.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1987 | 43.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +288.4% |
| 1988 | 85.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.2% |
| 1989 | 270.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +217.7% |
| 1990 | 283.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1991 | 152.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 1992 | 359.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +135.8% |
| 1993 | 412.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1994 | 295.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.4% |
| 1995 | 384.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1996 | 599.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.0% |
| 1997 | 404.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1998 | 246.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 1999 | 146.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 2000 | 104.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.4% |
| 2001 | 104.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2002 | 44.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.7% |
| 2003 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.8% |
| 2004 | 56.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +2946.7% |
| 2005 | 181.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.5% |
| 2006 | 213.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2007 | 772.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +261.6% |
| 2008 | 421.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 2009 | 719.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.9% |
| 2010 | 475.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 2011 | 297 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2012 | 34.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.3% |
| 2013 | 19.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 2014 | 32.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.6% |
| 2015 | 35.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2016 | 24.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.7% |
| 2017 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.8% |
| 2018 | 19.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +316.1% |
| 2019 | 26.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 2020 | 28.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2021 | 16.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.7% |
| 2022 | 6.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 2023 | 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +393.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 92.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1970s | 330.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 140.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 627.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 210.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 606.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 328.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 146.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 599.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 262.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 772.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 97.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 475.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 21.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 33 Mozambique 41.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Mali 40.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Pakistan 35.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Bulgaria 32.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Singapore 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Czechia 28.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Suriname
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 78,909 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,796 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 9.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 41,736 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 78,978 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -1.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 6,620 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.02 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Suriname?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Suriname was 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 772.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- How does Suriname rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Suriname ranks 36th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is up 66.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.