Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square in Syria
Syria: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square was 20.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Syria, 1972–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Syria recorded 20.13 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023.
That represents a change of up 105.2% on the previous year and down 92.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Syria peaked at 265.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.2178 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2011.
That places Syria 46th out of 160 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square in Syria, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 0.5985 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0.5441 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1974 | 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +1630.0% |
| 1975 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.2% |
| 1976 | 0.5985 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1977 | 0.8706 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 1978 | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +868.8% |
| 1979 | 6.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1980 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.8% |
| 1981 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1982 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.0% |
| 1983 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.5% |
| 1984 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1985 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1986 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1987 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 1988 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 1989 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1990 | 0.5985 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 1991 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +436.4% |
| 1992 | 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1993 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1994 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 1995 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1996 | 0.9794 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.4% |
| 1997 | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +583.3% |
| 1998 | 6.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1999 | 0.3265 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.8% |
| 2000 | 0.3809 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2001 | 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +3914.3% |
| 2002 | 12.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2003 | 28.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +132.4% |
| 2004 | 26.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2005 | 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.0% |
| 2006 | 0.4357 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.4% |
| 2007 | 0.3812 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2008 | 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +4100.0% |
| 2009 | 0.2723 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.3% |
| 2010 | 0.4901 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 2011 | 0.2178 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 2012 | 135.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +62239.3% |
| 2013 | 257.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.8% |
| 2014 | 237.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2015 | 249.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2016 | 129.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.2% |
| 2017 | 178.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 2018 | 265.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 2019 | 54.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.6% |
| 2020 | 130.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.4% |
| 2021 | 44.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.0% |
| 2022 | 9.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.8% |
| 2023 | 20.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.2% |
Syria compared with similar countries
- Syria's 20.13 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for low income countries, which is 12.94 current US$ per square kilometre, 1.6× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Syria's 20.13 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 27.96 current US$ per square kilometre, 72% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square in Syria changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +62239.3% | 0.2178 current US$ per square kilometre | 135.79 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2008 | +4100.0% | 0.3812 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2001 | +3914.3% | 0.3809 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.29 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1974 | +1630.0% | 0.5441 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1978 | +868.8% | 0.8706 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1997 | +583.3% | 0.9794 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5441 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1980s | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3265 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2723 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 150.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2178 current US$ per square kilometre | 265.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 51.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 130.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Syria
- 43 Barbados 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Sao Tome and Principe 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Iraq 20.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Hungary 19.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Lithuania 18.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Kenya 18.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Syria
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 15.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 31.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 74.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 226.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 46.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 820.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 72.15 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 136.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 37.74 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 67.51 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Syria?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Syria was 20.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Syria?
- The highest recorded value was 265.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Syria?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2178 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- How does Syria rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Syria ranks 46th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Syria?
- Over the last ten years it is down 92.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Syria data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.