Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
8.52 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 94.3%
Rank
24th
of 44 groups
All-time high
15.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
0.3496 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1964
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Upper middle income recorded 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023.
The figure is up 94.3% on the previous year and up 871.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Upper middle income peaked at 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.3496 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
That places Upper middle income 24th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.7515 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 1963 | 0.3596 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.2% |
| 1964 | 0.3496 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1965 | 0.4128 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1967 | 0.5484 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 1968 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.1% |
| 1969 | 0.7819 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 1970 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +138.9% |
| 1971 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1972 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 1973 | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1974 | 3.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1975 | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1976 | 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.4% |
| 1977 | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1978 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
| 1980 | 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1981 | 6.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1982 | 6.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1983 | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.7% |
| 1984 | 3.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1985 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.4% |
| 1986 | 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.6% |
| 1987 | 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 1988 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1989 | 8.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1990 | 10.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1991 | 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1992 | 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1993 | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1994 | 5.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1995 | 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.9% |
| 1996 | 7.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1997 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1998 | 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1999 | 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2000 | 9.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2001 | 12.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.9% |
| 2002 | 10.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2003 | 9.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2004 | 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 2005 | 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.9% |
| 2006 | 8.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.2% |
| 2007 | 8.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2008 | 10.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2009 | 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2010 | 5.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 2011 | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2012 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.2% |
| 2013 | 0.877 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.5% |
| 2014 | 0.5503 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.2% |
| 2015 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.2% |
| 2016 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +209.1% |
| 2017 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.5% |
| 2018 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 2019 | 0.695 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 2020 | 0.9692 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 2021 | 0.8672 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2022 | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +405.7% |
| 2023 | 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6839 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3496 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5503 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8672 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 21 Saint Kitts and Nevis 115.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Rwanda 112.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Burkina Faso 108.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Yemen 90.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Tonga 83.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Bhutan 67.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Malta 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Upper middle income was 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3496 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Upper middle income ranks 24th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 871.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.