Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) was 25.65 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1974–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) is 25.65 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 125.6% on the previous year and up 125.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 500 % change on previous year in 1993 and was at its lowest, -100 % change on previous year, in 1974.
That places Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) 17th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | -100 % change on previous year | — |
| 1977 | -100 % change on previous year | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -100 % change on previous year | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -25 % change on previous year | -75.0% |
| 1993 | 500 % change on previous year | -2100.0% |
| 1994 | -66.67 % change on previous year | -113.3% |
| 1995 | 300 % change on previous year | -550.0% |
| 1996 | -12.5 % change on previous year | -104.2% |
| 1997 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1998 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1999 | 419.05 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000 | -81.65 % change on previous year | -119.5% |
| 2001 | 15 % change on previous year | -118.4% |
| 2002 | -47.83 % change on previous year | -418.8% |
| 2003 | 91.67 % change on previous year | -291.7% |
| 2004 | 34.78 % change on previous year | -62.1% |
| 2005 | 38.71 % change on previous year | +11.3% |
| 2006 | -37.21 % change on previous year | -196.1% |
| 2007 | -92.59 % change on previous year | +148.8% |
| 2008 | 200 % change on previous year | -316.0% |
| 2009 | -100 % change on previous year | -150.0% |
| 2011 | 185.71 % change on previous year | -285.7% |
| 2012 | -100 % change on previous year | -153.8% |
| 2017 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2018 | -31.79 % change on previous year | — |
| 2019 | -13.5 % change on previous year | -57.5% |
| 2020 | 200.07 % change on previous year | -1581.7% |
| 2021 | -100 % change on previous year | -150.0% |
| 2023 | 25.65 % change on previous year | -125.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | +2100.0% | -25 % change on previous year | 500 % change on previous year |
| 2020 | +1581.7% | -13.5 % change on previous year | 200.07 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 2 |
| 1980s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 1 |
| 1990s | 139.36 % change on previous year | -66.67 % change on previous year | 500 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2000s | 2.09 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 200 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.08 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 185.71 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 2020s | 41.91 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 200.07 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 14 Fiji 167.81 % change on previous year compare
- 15 Botswana 165.54 % change on previous year compare
- 16 Samoa 159.16 % change on previous year compare
- 17 Somalia 142.17 % change on previous year compare
- 18 Syrian Arab Republic 132.49 % change on previous year compare
- 19 Malaysia 121.2 % change on previous year compare
- 20 Tuvalu 119.29 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 25.65 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 500 % change on previous year in 1993.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -100 % change on previous year in 1974.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 17th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 125.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.