Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in High income

High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) was -30.64 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
-30.64 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 9.0%
Rank
25th
of 45 groups
All-time high
582.61 % change on previous year
in 1990
All-time low
-76.43 % change on previous year
in 1991
Years of data
51
1973–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in High income, 1973–2023

0200400600197319982023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in High income is -30.64 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.

The figure is up 9.0% on the previous year and down 512.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in High income peaked at 582.61 % change on previous year in 1990 and was at its lowest, -76.43 % change on previous year, in 1991.

High income ranks 25th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in High income, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), annual growth rate in High income, 1973 to 2023.
Year % change on previous year Change
1973 50 % change on previous year
1974 12.12 % change on previous year -75.8%
1975 21.62 % change on previous year +78.4%
1976 -11.11 % change on previous year -151.4%
1977 -6.25 % change on previous year -43.7%
1978 5.33 % change on previous year -185.3%
1979 -37.97 % change on previous year -812.0%
1980 -46.94 % change on previous year +23.6%
1981 -15.38 % change on previous year -67.2%
1982 -31.82 % change on previous year +106.8%
1983 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1984 6.67 % change on previous year
1985 -25 % change on previous year -475.0%
1986 16.67 % change on previous year -166.7%
1987 35.71 % change on previous year +114.3%
1988 57.89 % change on previous year +62.1%
1989 -23.33 % change on previous year -140.3%
1990 582.61 % change on previous year -2596.9%
1991 -76.43 % change on previous year -113.1%
1992 -10.81 % change on previous year -85.9%
1993 12.12 % change on previous year -212.1%
1994 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1995 172.97 % change on previous year
1996 -1.98 % change on previous year -101.1%
1997 -6.06 % change on previous year +206.1%
1998 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1999 8.6 % change on previous year
2000 -48.51 % change on previous year -664.0%
2001 55.77 % change on previous year -215.0%
2002 1.23 % change on previous year -97.8%
2003 10.98 % change on previous year +789.0%
2004 2.2 % change on previous year -80.0%
2005 10.75 % change on previous year +389.2%
2006 -33.98 % change on previous year -416.0%
2007 204.41 % change on previous year -701.6%
2008 -21.74 % change on previous year -110.6%
2009 -3.09 % change on previous year -85.8%
2010 67.52 % change on previous year -2287.5%
2011 3.42 % change on previous year -94.9%
2012 10.29 % change on previous year +200.8%
2013 -5 % change on previous year -148.6%
2014 1.75 % change on previous year -135.1%
2015 2.76 % change on previous year +57.2%
2016 -21.14 % change on previous year -866.4%
2017 24.68 % change on previous year -216.7%
2018 25.31 % change on previous year +2.6%
2019 -5.47 % change on previous year -121.6%
2020 39.27 % change on previous year -817.3%
2021 -12.33 % change on previous year -131.4%
2022 -33.68 % change on previous year +173.2%
2023 -30.64 % change on previous year -9.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 4.82 % change on previous year -37.97 % change on previous year 50 % change on previous year 7
1980s -2.55 % change on previous year -46.94 % change on previous year 57.89 % change on previous year 10
1990s 68.1 % change on previous year -76.43 % change on previous year 582.61 % change on previous year 10
2000s 17.8 % change on previous year -48.51 % change on previous year 204.41 % change on previous year 10
2010s 10.41 % change on previous year -21.14 % change on previous year 67.52 % change on previous year 10
2020s -9.34 % change on previous year -33.68 % change on previous year 39.27 % change on previous year 4

Countries ranked near High income

  1. 22 Vanuatu 91.45 % change on previous year compare
  2. 23 Seychelles 83.33 % change on previous year compare
  3. 24 Egypt 61.19 % change on previous year compare
  4. 25 Afghanistan 56.33 % change on previous year compare
  5. 26 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 54.36 % change on previous year compare
  6. 27 Belize 50 % change on previous year compare
  7. 28 Timor-Leste 38.88 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 148 places →

More aid effectiveness data for High income

All data for High income →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in High income?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in High income was -30.64 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in High income?
The highest recorded value was 582.61 % change on previous year in 1990.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in High income?
The lowest recorded value was -76.43 % change on previous year in 1991.
How does High income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
High income ranks 25th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) rising or falling in High income?
Over the last ten years it is down 512.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this High income data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in High income. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-annual-growth-rate/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-annual-growth-rate/high-income/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in High income</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
148 places, 4,751 data points, 1971–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.