Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Bhutan
Bhutan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) was 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Bhutan, 1972–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Bhutan is 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2021.
That represents a change of up 224.6% on the previous year and up 396.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Bhutan peaked at 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1979.
That places Bhutan 42nd out of 112 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0.6421 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1974 | 0.6421 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.8561 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1976 | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +650.0% |
| 1977 | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.3% |
| 1978 | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1980 | 0.6421 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1981 | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1982 | 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1987 | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1988 | 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1989 | 0.6421 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1990 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1991 | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 1992 | 0.6421 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1993 | 0.8561 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1994 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.4% |
| 1995 | 6.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +271.4% |
| 1996 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.8% |
| 1997 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.5025 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.0% |
| 1999 | 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +1450.0% |
| 2000 | 6.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2001 | 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2002 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 2003 | 6.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 2004 | 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.6% |
| 2005 | 9.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2006 | 4.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.6% |
| 2007 | 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2008 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.8% |
| 2009 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2010 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2016 | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +224.8% |
| 2017 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +138.5% |
| 2018 | 8.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2019 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 2020 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.5% |
| 2021 | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +224.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1980s | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6421 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1990s | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2020s | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 39 Mauritius 7.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Sri Lanka 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Dominica 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Uruguay 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Türkiye 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Ethiopia 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bhutan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 447,902 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2006)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 210,579 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 13,879 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 182,915 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 57,307 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 60.91 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Bhutan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Bhutan was 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.214 current US$ per square kilometre in 1979.
- How does Bhutan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Bhutan ranks 42nd out of 112 countries with data for 2021.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 396.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 41 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.