Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) was 326,113 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Tuvalu, 1977–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Tuvalu stood at 326,113 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 119.3% on the previous year and up 185.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Tuvalu peaked at 474,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1977.
That places Tuvalu 1st out of 112 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1977 | 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 1,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1979 | 4,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +225.0% |
| 1980 | 10,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +138.5% |
| 1981 | 14,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.7% |
| 1982 | 12,667 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1983 | 12,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1984 | 17,667 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 1985 | 13,667 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 1986 | 39,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +187.8% |
| 1987 | 216,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +450.0% |
| 1988 | 39,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.0% |
| 1989 | 36,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1990 | 36,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1991 | 47,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.3% |
| 1992 | 31,667 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 1993 | 37,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1994 | 39,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1995 | 41,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1996 | 46,667 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1997 | 56,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1998 | 53,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1999 | 40,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2000 | 36,667 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2001 | 30,667 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2002 | 32,667 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2003 | 41,667 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 2004 | 39,333 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2005 | 54,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 2006 | 47,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2007 | 72,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.2% |
| 2008 | 149,667 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.9% |
| 2009 | 44,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.6% |
| 2010 | 63,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.2% |
| 2011 | 130,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.3% |
| 2012 | 143,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2013 | 114,333 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2014 | 339,667 current US$ per square kilometre | +197.1% |
| 2015 | 474,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 2016 | 166,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.0% |
| 2017 | 172,333 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 115,836 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2019 | 213,539 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.3% |
| 2020 | 239,975 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2021 | 183,662 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 2022 | 148,710 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2023 | 326,113 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2,222 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,333 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1980s | 41,133 current US$ per square kilometre | 10,333 current US$ per square kilometre | 216,333 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 42,900 current US$ per square kilometre | 31,667 current US$ per square kilometre | 56,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 54,800 current US$ per square kilometre | 30,667 current US$ per square kilometre | 149,667 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 193,171 current US$ per square kilometre | 63,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 474,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 224,615 current US$ per square kilometre | 148,710 current US$ per square kilometre | 326,113 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
More aid effectiveness data for Tuvalu
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,767 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 156,337 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7,198 current US$ (2016)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4,478 current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 14,066 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 125,622 current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 432,186 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 35.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States 100,000 current US$ (2023)
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP 48,059 current US$ (2018)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Tuvalu?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) in Tuvalu was 326,113 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was 474,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 1977.
- How does Tuvalu rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Tuvalu ranks 1st out of 112 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) rising or falling in Tuvalu?
- Over the last ten years it is up 185.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 47 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.