Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand was 9.01 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1972–2022
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 9.01 million current US$, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 21.0% on the previous year and down 51.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 22.34 million current US$ in 2005 and was at its lowest, 60,000 current US$, in 1972.
That places Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) 27th out of 43 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 60,000 current US$ | — |
| 1973 | 120,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 160,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1975 | 1.22 million current US$ | +662.5% |
| 1976 | 600,000 current US$ | -50.8% |
| 1977 | 480,000 current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1978 | 950,000 current US$ | +97.9% |
| 1979 | 870,000 current US$ | -8.4% |
| 1980 | 1.24 million current US$ | +42.5% |
| 1981 | 800,000 current US$ | -35.5% |
| 1982 | 140,000 current US$ | -82.5% |
| 1983 | 80,000 current US$ | -42.9% |
| 1984 | 90,000 current US$ | +12.5% |
| 1985 | 100,000 current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1986 | 110,000 current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1987 | 130,000 current US$ | +18.2% |
| 1988 | 450,000 current US$ | +246.2% |
| 1989 | 290,000 current US$ | -35.6% |
| 1990 | 380,000 current US$ | +31.0% |
| 1991 | 360,000 current US$ | -5.3% |
| 1992 | 230,000 current US$ | -36.1% |
| 1993 | 600,000 current US$ | +160.9% |
| 1994 | 2.55 million current US$ | +325.0% |
| 1995 | 2.08 million current US$ | -18.4% |
| 1996 | 2.24 million current US$ | +7.7% |
| 1997 | 3.31 million current US$ | +47.8% |
| 1998 | 1.87 million current US$ | -43.5% |
| 1999 | 2.88 million current US$ | +54.0% |
| 2000 | 3.09 million current US$ | +7.3% |
| 2001 | 3.82 million current US$ | +23.6% |
| 2002 | 6.43 million current US$ | +68.3% |
| 2003 | 9.04 million current US$ | +40.6% |
| 2004 | 19.28 million current US$ | +113.3% |
| 2005 | 22.34 million current US$ | +15.9% |
| 2006 | 9.59 million current US$ | -57.1% |
| 2007 | 10.59 million current US$ | +10.4% |
| 2008 | 15.61 million current US$ | +47.4% |
| 2009 | 9.98 million current US$ | -36.1% |
| 2010 | 7.78 million current US$ | -22.0% |
| 2011 | 13.01 million current US$ | +67.2% |
| 2012 | 18.72 million current US$ | +43.9% |
| 2013 | 8.92 million current US$ | -52.4% |
| 2014 | 7.88 million current US$ | -11.7% |
| 2015 | 6.81 million current US$ | -13.6% |
| 2016 | 6.69 million current US$ | -1.8% |
| 2017 | 10.78 million current US$ | +61.1% |
| 2018 | 5.45 million current US$ | -49.4% |
| 2019 | 8.84 million current US$ | +62.2% |
| 2020 | 8.44 million current US$ | -4.5% |
| 2021 | 11.40 million current US$ | +35.1% |
| 2022 | 9.01 million current US$ | -21.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 557,500 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 1.22 million current US$ | 8 |
| 1980s | 343,000 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 1.24 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.65 million current US$ | 230,000 current US$ | 3.31 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.98 million current US$ | 3.09 million current US$ | 22.34 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.49 million current US$ | 5.45 million current US$ | 18.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.62 million current US$ | 8.44 million current US$ | 11.40 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 24 Somalia 1.69 million current US$ compare
- 24 South Sudan 1.69 million current US$ compare
- 26 Burundi 1.25 million current US$ compare
- 27 Pakistan 1.24 million current US$ compare
- 28 Venezuela 1.06 million current US$ compare
- 29 Yemen 920,923 current US$ compare
- 30 Rwanda 859,528 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 9.01 million current US$ in 2022, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 22.34 million current US$ in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 60,000 current US$ in 1972.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th out of 43 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 51.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.