Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand was 593.19 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in Low & middle income, 1970–2023
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Low & middle income is 593.19 million current US$, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 55.2% on the previous year and up 89.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Low & middle income peaked at 593.19 million current US$ in 2023 and was at its lowest, 10.80 million current US$, in 1970.
Low & middle income ranks 2nd of 43 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 10.80 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 13.10 million current US$ | +21.3% |
| 1972 | 14.45 million current US$ | +10.3% |
| 1973 | 17.17 million current US$ | +18.8% |
| 1974 | 25.71 million current US$ | +49.7% |
| 1975 | 47.78 million current US$ | +85.8% |
| 1976 | 39.48 million current US$ | -17.4% |
| 1977 | 37.22 million current US$ | -5.7% |
| 1978 | 39.70 million current US$ | +6.7% |
| 1979 | 46.57 million current US$ | +17.3% |
| 1980 | 47.29 million current US$ | +1.5% |
| 1981 | 45.71 million current US$ | -3.3% |
| 1982 | 43.46 million current US$ | -4.9% |
| 1983 | 40.58 million current US$ | -6.6% |
| 1984 | 39.14 million current US$ | -3.5% |
| 1985 | 37.81 million current US$ | -3.4% |
| 1986 | 55.28 million current US$ | +46.2% |
| 1987 | 58.09 million current US$ | +5.1% |
| 1988 | 85.16 million current US$ | +46.6% |
| 1989 | 67.00 million current US$ | -21.3% |
| 1990 | 70.20 million current US$ | +4.8% |
| 1991 | 69.14 million current US$ | -1.5% |
| 1992 | 66.01 million current US$ | -4.5% |
| 1993 | 67.25 million current US$ | +1.9% |
| 1994 | 75.92 million current US$ | +12.9% |
| 1995 | 86.66 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 1996 | 91.24 million current US$ | +5.3% |
| 1997 | 104.08 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 1998 | 91.36 million current US$ | -12.2% |
| 1999 | 93.12 million current US$ | +1.9% |
| 2000 | 78.95 million current US$ | -15.2% |
| 2001 | 77.64 million current US$ | -1.7% |
| 2002 | 82.34 million current US$ | +6.1% |
| 2003 | 113.34 million current US$ | +37.6% |
| 2004 | 141.35 million current US$ | +24.7% |
| 2005 | 187.90 million current US$ | +32.9% |
| 2006 | 187.83 million current US$ | -0.0% |
| 2007 | 220.29 million current US$ | +17.3% |
| 2008 | 240.23 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 2009 | 209.96 million current US$ | -12.6% |
| 2010 | 243.73 million current US$ | +16.1% |
| 2011 | 293.54 million current US$ | +20.4% |
| 2012 | 328.68 million current US$ | +12.0% |
| 2013 | 312.70 million current US$ | -4.9% |
| 2014 | 378.62 million current US$ | +21.1% |
| 2015 | 330.83 million current US$ | -12.6% |
| 2016 | 335.60 million current US$ | +1.4% |
| 2017 | 349.52 million current US$ | +4.1% |
| 2018 | 414.54 million current US$ | +18.6% |
| 2019 | 412.17 million current US$ | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 391.41 million current US$ | -5.0% |
| 2021 | 531.17 million current US$ | +35.7% |
| 2022 | 382.12 million current US$ | -28.1% |
| 2023 | 593.19 million current US$ | +55.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 29.20 million current US$ | 10.80 million current US$ | 47.78 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 51.95 million current US$ | 37.81 million current US$ | 85.16 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 81.50 million current US$ | 66.01 million current US$ | 104.08 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 153.98 million current US$ | 77.64 million current US$ | 240.23 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 339.99 million current US$ | 243.73 million current US$ | 414.54 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 474.47 million current US$ | 382.12 million current US$ | 593.19 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Low & middle income was 593.19 million current US$ in 2023, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 593.19 million current US$ in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.80 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
- Low & middle income ranks 2nd out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 89.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.