Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand was 590,000 current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in OECD members, 1972–2022
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in OECD members stood at 590,000 current US$.
That represents a change of down 9.2% on the previous year and up 37.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in OECD members peaked at 1.62 million current US$ in 2017 and was at its lowest, 20,000 current US$, in 1983.
OECD members ranks 42nd of 43 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 220,000 current US$ | — |
| 1973 | 270,000 current US$ | +22.7% |
| 1974 | 450,000 current US$ | +66.7% |
| 1975 | 500,000 current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1976 | 380,000 current US$ | -24.0% |
| 1977 | 500,000 current US$ | +31.6% |
| 1978 | 410,000 current US$ | -18.0% |
| 1979 | 280,000 current US$ | -31.7% |
| 1980 | 100,000 current US$ | -64.3% |
| 1981 | 50,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1982 | 30,000 current US$ | -40.0% |
| 1983 | 20,000 current US$ | -33.3% |
| 1984 | 70,000 current US$ | +250.0% |
| 1985 | 190,000 current US$ | +171.4% |
| 1986 | 130,000 current US$ | -31.6% |
| 1987 | 90,000 current US$ | -30.8% |
| 1988 | 150,000 current US$ | +66.7% |
| 1989 | 90,000 current US$ | -40.0% |
| 1990 | 180,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1991 | 190,000 current US$ | +5.6% |
| 1992 | 170,000 current US$ | -10.5% |
| 1993 | 360,000 current US$ | +111.8% |
| 1994 | 300,000 current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1995 | 540,000 current US$ | +80.0% |
| 1996 | 520,000 current US$ | -3.7% |
| 1997 | 900,000 current US$ | +73.1% |
| 1998 | 860,000 current US$ | -4.4% |
| 1999 | 870,000 current US$ | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 730,000 current US$ | -16.1% |
| 2001 | 620,000 current US$ | -15.1% |
| 2002 | 730,000 current US$ | +17.7% |
| 2003 | 1.10 million current US$ | +50.7% |
| 2004 | 1.23 million current US$ | +11.8% |
| 2005 | 900,000 current US$ | -26.8% |
| 2006 | 560,000 current US$ | -37.8% |
| 2007 | 640,000 current US$ | +14.3% |
| 2008 | 670,000 current US$ | +4.7% |
| 2009 | 260,000 current US$ | -61.2% |
| 2010 | 730,000 current US$ | +180.8% |
| 2011 | 1.41 million current US$ | +93.2% |
| 2012 | 430,000 current US$ | -69.5% |
| 2013 | 520,000 current US$ | +20.9% |
| 2014 | 730,000 current US$ | +40.4% |
| 2015 | 1.40 million current US$ | +91.8% |
| 2016 | 1.30 million current US$ | -7.1% |
| 2017 | 1.62 million current US$ | +24.6% |
| 2018 | 1.29 million current US$ | -20.4% |
| 2019 | 600,000 current US$ | -53.5% |
| 2020 | 820,000 current US$ | +36.7% |
| 2021 | 650,000 current US$ | -20.7% |
| 2022 | 590,000 current US$ | -9.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 376,250 current US$ | 220,000 current US$ | 500,000 current US$ | 8 |
| 1980s | 92,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 190,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 489,000 current US$ | 170,000 current US$ | 900,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 744,000 current US$ | 260,000 current US$ | 1.23 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.00 million current US$ | 430,000 current US$ | 1.62 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 686,667 current US$ | 590,000 current US$ | 820,000 current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 39 Mali 400,000 current US$ compare
- 40 Sri Lanka 360,595 current US$ compare
- 41 Iran, Islamic Republic of 350,000 current US$ compare
- 41 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 350,000 current US$ compare
- 43 New Caledonia 330,000 current US$ compare
- 44 Lebanon 324,423 current US$ compare
- 45 Botswana 259,223 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per 2.48 constant 2023 US$ per person (2021)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 2.48 constant 2023 US$ per person (2021)
- Net official development assistance received (current US$), annual 5.88 % change on previous year (2021)
- Net official development assistance received (current US$), per 102.19 current US$ per square kilometre (2021)
- Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Net official development assistance received (current US$), per capita 2.63 current US$ per person (2021)
- Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$) -0.0507 % change on previous year (2021)
- Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per 96.47 constant 2023 US$ per square kilometre (2021)
- Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per 0.0001 constant 2023 US$ per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 0.0001 constant 2023 US$ per US$ of GDP (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in OECD members was 590,000 current US$ in 2022, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 1.62 million current US$ in 2017.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was 20,000 current US$ in 1983.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
- OECD members ranks 42nd out of 43 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.