Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Small states
Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) was 95.99 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand in Small states, 1972–2022
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Small states stood at 95.99 million current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 57.7% on the previous year and down 17.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Small states peaked at 227.00 million current US$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, 2.24 million current US$, in 1972.
Small states ranks 13th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) in Small states, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 2.24 million current US$ | — |
| 1973 | 3.82 million current US$ | +70.5% |
| 1974 | 4.66 million current US$ | +22.0% |
| 1975 | 10.33 million current US$ | +121.7% |
| 1976 | 12.53 million current US$ | +21.3% |
| 1977 | 10.81 million current US$ | -13.7% |
| 1978 | 11.35 million current US$ | +5.0% |
| 1979 | 15.70 million current US$ | +38.3% |
| 1980 | 12.72 million current US$ | -19.0% |
| 1981 | 11.50 million current US$ | -9.6% |
| 1982 | 10.68 million current US$ | -7.1% |
| 1983 | 12.59 million current US$ | +17.9% |
| 1984 | 13.25 million current US$ | +5.2% |
| 1985 | 12.75 million current US$ | -3.8% |
| 1986 | 12.35 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 1987 | 22.39 million current US$ | +81.3% |
| 1988 | 15.21 million current US$ | -32.1% |
| 1989 | 15.09 million current US$ | -0.8% |
| 1990 | 22.92 million current US$ | +51.9% |
| 1991 | 17.24 million current US$ | -24.8% |
| 1992 | 24.28 million current US$ | +40.8% |
| 1993 | 26.10 million current US$ | +7.5% |
| 1994 | 19.94 million current US$ | -23.6% |
| 1995 | 29.19 million current US$ | +46.4% |
| 1996 | 31.24 million current US$ | +7.0% |
| 1997 | 32.20 million current US$ | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 27.78 million current US$ | -13.7% |
| 1999 | 30.35 million current US$ | +9.3% |
| 2000 | 25.69 million current US$ | -15.4% |
| 2001 | 25.16 million current US$ | -2.1% |
| 2002 | 22.80 million current US$ | -9.4% |
| 2003 | 30.29 million current US$ | +32.9% |
| 2004 | 37.11 million current US$ | +22.5% |
| 2005 | 37.44 million current US$ | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 54.22 million current US$ | +44.8% |
| 2007 | 57.40 million current US$ | +5.9% |
| 2008 | 65.90 million current US$ | +14.8% |
| 2009 | 77.30 million current US$ | +17.3% |
| 2010 | 85.54 million current US$ | +10.7% |
| 2011 | 92.47 million current US$ | +8.1% |
| 2012 | 115.74 million current US$ | +25.2% |
| 2013 | 112.50 million current US$ | -2.8% |
| 2014 | 136.30 million current US$ | +21.2% |
| 2015 | 130.29 million current US$ | -4.4% |
| 2016 | 120.30 million current US$ | -7.7% |
| 2017 | 109.06 million current US$ | -9.3% |
| 2018 | 135.84 million current US$ | +24.6% |
| 2019 | 115.38 million current US$ | -15.1% |
| 2020 | 135.61 million current US$ | +17.5% |
| 2021 | 227.00 million current US$ | +67.4% |
| 2022 | 95.99 million current US$ | -57.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.93 million current US$ | 2.24 million current US$ | 15.70 million current US$ | 8 |
| 1980s | 13.85 million current US$ | 10.68 million current US$ | 22.39 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 26.12 million current US$ | 17.24 million current US$ | 32.20 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 43.33 million current US$ | 22.80 million current US$ | 77.30 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 115.34 million current US$ | 85.54 million current US$ | 136.30 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 152.87 million current US$ | 95.99 million current US$ | 227.00 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Small states
- 10 Philippines 11.66 million current US$ compare
- 11 Vietnam 11.09 million current US$ compare
- 12 East Timor 10.61 million current US$ compare
- 13 Cambodia 10.48 million current US$ compare
- 14 Tuvalu 9.78 million current US$ compare
- 15 Myanmar 8.56 million current US$ compare
- 16 Afghanistan 6.91 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Small states
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.22 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 470,000 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 42.93 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 239.53 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 5.86 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 93.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 265.88 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 33.07 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 6.72 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 355.78 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Small states?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand in Small states was 95.99 million current US$ in 2022, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in Small states?
- The highest recorded value was 227.00 million current US$ in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand recorded in Small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.24 million current US$ in 1972.
- How does Small states rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
- Small states ranks 13th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand rising or falling in Small states?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Small states data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.