Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in Bhutan
Bhutan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual was 648.9 % change on previous year in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in Bhutan, 1974–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Bhutan is 648.9 % change on previous year, measured in 2021. That is the highest value across all 40 years on record.
The figure is up 846.0% on the previous year and up 1,318.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Bhutan peaked at 648.9 % change on previous year in 2021 and was at its lowest, -90.29 % change on previous year, in 2016.
Bhutan ranks 2nd of 139 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 100 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1984 | 443.75 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 50.57 % change on previous year | -88.6% |
| 1986 | 209.16 % change on previous year | +313.6% |
| 1987 | -24.44 % change on previous year | -111.7% |
| 1988 | -43.46 % change on previous year | +77.8% |
| 1989 | 26.59 % change on previous year | -161.2% |
| 1990 | -39.27 % change on previous year | -247.7% |
| 1991 | 532.33 % change on previous year | -1455.6% |
| 1992 | -78.12 % change on previous year | -114.7% |
| 1993 | -40.22 % change on previous year | -48.5% |
| 1994 | -42.73 % change on previous year | +6.2% |
| 1995 | 23.81 % change on previous year | -155.7% |
| 1996 | 30.77 % change on previous year | +29.2% |
| 1997 | -46.08 % change on previous year | -249.8% |
| 1998 | 380 % change on previous year | -924.7% |
| 1999 | -74.62 % change on previous year | -119.6% |
| 2000 | 114.92 % change on previous year | -254.0% |
| 2001 | -54.17 % change on previous year | -147.1% |
| 2002 | 66.67 % change on previous year | -223.1% |
| 2003 | 17.27 % change on previous year | -74.1% |
| 2004 | -31.78 % change on previous year | -284.0% |
| 2005 | -7.95 % change on previous year | -75.0% |
| 2006 | 62.96 % change on previous year | -891.5% |
| 2007 | -6.82 % change on previous year | -110.8% |
| 2008 | -22.76 % change on previous year | +233.9% |
| 2009 | 91.58 % change on previous year | -502.3% |
| 2010 | 3.3 % change on previous year | -96.4% |
| 2011 | 45.74 % change on previous year | +1287.6% |
| 2012 | -64.41 % change on previous year | -240.8% |
| 2013 | 36.33 % change on previous year | -156.4% |
| 2014 | 305.52 % change on previous year | +741.0% |
| 2015 | -33.75 % change on previous year | -111.0% |
| 2016 | -90.29 % change on previous year | +167.5% |
| 2017 | -47.18 % change on previous year | -47.7% |
| 2018 | -50.88 % change on previous year | +7.8% |
| 2019 | -21.58 % change on previous year | -57.6% |
| 2020 | -86.98 % change on previous year | +303.0% |
| 2021 | 648.9 % change on previous year | -846.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 50 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 100 % change on previous year | 2 |
| 1980s | 110.36 % change on previous year | -43.46 % change on previous year | 443.75 % change on previous year | 6 |
| 1990s | 64.59 % change on previous year | -78.12 % change on previous year | 532.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 22.99 % change on previous year | -54.17 % change on previous year | 114.92 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.28 % change on previous year | -90.29 % change on previous year | 305.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 280.96 % change on previous year | -86.98 % change on previous year | 648.9 % change on previous year | 2 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 1 Uzbekistan 873.54 % change on previous year compare
- 3 Cape Verde 237.16 % change on previous year compare
- 4 Türkiye 227.25 % change on previous year compare
- 5 Thailand 170.1 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bhutan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 447,902 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2006)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 210,579 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 13,879 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 182,915 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 57,307 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 60.91 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Bhutan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Bhutan was 648.9 % change on previous year in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 648.9 % change on previous year in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was -90.29 % change on previous year in 2016.
- How does Bhutan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual?
- Bhutan ranks 2nd out of 139 countries with data for 2021.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,318.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.