Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual was -20.29 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in OECD members, 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
OECD members recorded -20.29 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in 2022.
The figure is down 175.6% on the previous year and down 107.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in OECD members peaked at 659.62 % change on previous year in 1990 and was at its lowest, -266.67 % change on previous year, in 1974.
OECD members ranks 39th of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in OECD members, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | -95.89 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | -94.55 % change on previous year | -1.4% |
| 1974 | -266.67 % change on previous year | +182.1% |
| 1975 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1976 | 220 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | -84.52 % change on previous year | -138.4% |
| 1980 | -1.73 % change on previous year | -98.0% |
| 1981 | -97.87 % change on previous year | +5561.0% |
| 1982 | 295.65 % change on previous year | -402.1% |
| 1983 | -31.87 % change on previous year | -110.8% |
| 1984 | 30.65 % change on previous year | -196.2% |
| 1985 | 208.64 % change on previous year | +580.8% |
| 1986 | -31.6 % change on previous year | -115.1% |
| 1987 | -50.88 % change on previous year | +61.0% |
| 1988 | 94.05 % change on previous year | -284.9% |
| 1989 | 123.31 % change on previous year | +31.1% |
| 1990 | 659.62 % change on previous year | +434.9% |
| 1991 | -36.17 % change on previous year | -105.5% |
| 1992 | 195.13 % change on previous year | -639.5% |
| 1993 | -40.81 % change on previous year | -120.9% |
| 1994 | 34.45 % change on previous year | -184.4% |
| 1995 | -61.64 % change on previous year | -278.9% |
| 1996 | 8.24 % change on previous year | -113.4% |
| 1997 | 13.36 % change on previous year | +62.2% |
| 1998 | -6.82 % change on previous year | -151.0% |
| 1999 | -12.76 % change on previous year | +87.2% |
| 2000 | -24.78 % change on previous year | +94.2% |
| 2001 | 35.96 % change on previous year | -245.1% |
| 2002 | 9.06 % change on previous year | -74.8% |
| 2003 | 20.35 % change on previous year | +124.5% |
| 2004 | -19.26 % change on previous year | -194.6% |
| 2005 | 84.41 % change on previous year | -538.3% |
| 2006 | -17.7 % change on previous year | -121.0% |
| 2007 | 42.58 % change on previous year | -340.6% |
| 2008 | 25.32 % change on previous year | -40.5% |
| 2009 | -44.77 % change on previous year | -276.8% |
| 2010 | 8.58 % change on previous year | -119.2% |
| 2011 | -53.22 % change on previous year | -720.1% |
| 2012 | 278.82 % change on previous year | -623.9% |
| 2013 | -24.06 % change on previous year | -108.6% |
| 2014 | -22.96 % change on previous year | -4.6% |
| 2015 | -14.28 % change on previous year | -37.8% |
| 2016 | 93.24 % change on previous year | -752.9% |
| 2017 | 46.21 % change on previous year | -50.4% |
| 2018 | -17.52 % change on previous year | -137.9% |
| 2019 | 44.6 % change on previous year | -354.6% |
| 2020 | -27.67 % change on previous year | -162.0% |
| 2021 | 26.84 % change on previous year | -197.0% |
| 2022 | -20.29 % change on previous year | -175.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -53.6 % change on previous year | -266.67 % change on previous year | 220 % change on previous year | 6 |
| 1980s | 53.84 % change on previous year | -97.87 % change on previous year | 295.65 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 75.26 % change on previous year | -61.64 % change on previous year | 659.62 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.12 % change on previous year | -44.77 % change on previous year | 84.41 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.94 % change on previous year | -53.22 % change on previous year | 278.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -7.04 % change on previous year | -27.67 % change on previous year | 26.84 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 36 Botswana 10.02 % change on previous year compare
- 37 Guatemala 9.84 % change on previous year compare
- 38 Lao People's Democratic Republic 9.55 % change on previous year compare
- 39 Gambia 8.95 % change on previous year compare
- 40 Tanzania, United Republic of 8.9 % change on previous year compare
- 41 Somalia 7.28 % change on previous year compare
- 42 Madagascar 6.9 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in OECD members was -20.29 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 659.62 % change on previous year in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -266.67 % change on previous year in 1974.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual?
- OECD members ranks 39th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is down 107.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.