Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in Small states
Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual was -72.21 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in Small states, 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Small states stood at -72.21 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 127.9% on the previous year and down 5.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Small states peaked at 627.88 % change on previous year in 2014 and was at its lowest, -86.11 % change on previous year, in 2020.
Small states ranks 41st of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual in Small states, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | -80 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 25.82 % change on previous year | -132.3% |
| 1976 | 36.27 % change on previous year | +40.5% |
| 1977 | 5.2 % change on previous year | -85.7% |
| 1978 | 62.6 % change on previous year | +1104.7% |
| 1979 | 10.35 % change on previous year | -83.5% |
| 1980 | 11.52 % change on previous year | +11.2% |
| 1981 | -43.78 % change on previous year | -480.1% |
| 1982 | 4.66 % change on previous year | -110.6% |
| 1983 | 23.29 % change on previous year | +399.8% |
| 1984 | -4.31 % change on previous year | -118.5% |
| 1985 | 33.96 % change on previous year | -888.8% |
| 1986 | 38.79 % change on previous year | +14.2% |
| 1987 | 15.22 % change on previous year | -60.8% |
| 1988 | 12.03 % change on previous year | -21.0% |
| 1989 | 14.76 % change on previous year | +22.7% |
| 1990 | 8.72 % change on previous year | -40.9% |
| 1991 | 42.44 % change on previous year | +386.6% |
| 1992 | -21.03 % change on previous year | -149.6% |
| 1993 | -17.63 % change on previous year | -16.2% |
| 1994 | -26.39 % change on previous year | +49.7% |
| 1995 | -6.5 % change on previous year | -75.4% |
| 1996 | 10.68 % change on previous year | -264.2% |
| 1997 | 8.34 % change on previous year | -21.9% |
| 1998 | -30.24 % change on previous year | -462.4% |
| 1999 | -51.75 % change on previous year | +71.1% |
| 2000 | 91.53 % change on previous year | -276.9% |
| 2001 | -14.85 % change on previous year | -116.2% |
| 2002 | 19.23 % change on previous year | -229.5% |
| 2003 | -20.05 % change on previous year | -204.3% |
| 2004 | 5.45 % change on previous year | -127.2% |
| 2005 | 6.95 % change on previous year | +27.5% |
| 2006 | 27.28 % change on previous year | +292.6% |
| 2007 | 9.58 % change on previous year | -64.9% |
| 2008 | 10.55 % change on previous year | +10.2% |
| 2009 | -46.71 % change on previous year | -542.7% |
| 2010 | 186.01 % change on previous year | -498.2% |
| 2011 | 36.43 % change on previous year | -80.4% |
| 2012 | -68.69 % change on previous year | -288.6% |
| 2013 | -20.17 % change on previous year | -70.6% |
| 2014 | 627.88 % change on previous year | -3212.8% |
| 2015 | -85.52 % change on previous year | -113.6% |
| 2016 | -44.91 % change on previous year | -47.5% |
| 2017 | -14.09 % change on previous year | -68.6% |
| 2018 | 4.97 % change on previous year | -135.3% |
| 2019 | 570.93 % change on previous year | +11380.4% |
| 2020 | -86.11 % change on previous year | -115.1% |
| 2021 | 258.79 % change on previous year | -400.5% |
| 2022 | -72.21 % change on previous year | -127.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.61 % change on previous year | -80 % change on previous year | 62.6 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 1980s | 10.61 % change on previous year | -43.78 % change on previous year | 38.79 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -8.34 % change on previous year | -51.75 % change on previous year | 42.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.9 % change on previous year | -46.71 % change on previous year | 91.53 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 119.28 % change on previous year | -85.52 % change on previous year | 627.88 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 33.49 % change on previous year | -86.11 % change on previous year | 258.79 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Small states
- 38 Lao People's Democratic Republic 9.55 % change on previous year compare
- 39 Gambia 8.95 % change on previous year compare
- 40 Tanzania, United Republic of 8.9 % change on previous year compare
- 41 Somalia 7.28 % change on previous year compare
- 42 Madagascar 6.9 % change on previous year compare
- 43 Bangladesh 6.57 % change on previous year compare
- 44 Jordan 5.57 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Small states
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.22 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 470,000 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 42.93 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 239.53 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 5.86 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 93.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 265.88 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 33.07 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 6.72 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 355.78 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Small states?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual in Small states was -72.21 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in Small states?
- The highest recorded value was 627.88 % change on previous year in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual recorded in Small states?
- The lowest recorded value was -86.11 % change on previous year in 2020.
- How does Small states rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual?
- Small states ranks 41st out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), annual rising or falling in Small states?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Small states data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.