Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in European Union
European Union: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 3.46 million current US$ in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in European Union, 1974–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2010, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in European Union stood at 3.46 million current US$.
The figure is down 3.9% on the previous year and down 57.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in European Union peaked at 41.47 million current US$ in 1992 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1978.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in European Union, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 180,000 current US$ | — |
| 1975 | 137,500 current US$ | -23.6% |
| 1976 | 95,000 current US$ | -30.9% |
| 1977 | 52,500 current US$ | -44.7% |
| 1978 | 10,000 current US$ | -81.0% |
| 1990 | 21.11 million current US$ | +211000.0% |
| 1991 | 5.65 million current US$ | -73.2% |
| 1992 | 41.47 million current US$ | +634.0% |
| 1993 | 27.87 million current US$ | -32.8% |
| 1994 | 40.67 million current US$ | +45.9% |
| 1995 | 15.21 million current US$ | -62.6% |
| 1996 | 18.51 million current US$ | +21.7% |
| 1997 | 19.14 million current US$ | +3.4% |
| 1998 | 22.28 million current US$ | +16.4% |
| 1999 | 7.76 million current US$ | -65.2% |
| 2000 | 8.12 million current US$ | +4.6% |
| 2001 | 22.91 million current US$ | +182.1% |
| 2002 | 20.02 million current US$ | -12.6% |
| 2003 | 19.76 million current US$ | -1.3% |
| 2004 | 19.14 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 2005 | 15.49 million current US$ | -19.1% |
| 2006 | 14.94 million current US$ | -3.6% |
| 2007 | 6.92 million current US$ | -53.7% |
| 2008 | 4.23 million current US$ | -38.9% |
| 2009 | 3.60 million current US$ | -14.9% |
| 2010 | 3.46 million current US$ | -3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 95,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 5 |
| 1990s | 21.97 million current US$ | 5.65 million current US$ | 41.47 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.51 million current US$ | 3.60 million current US$ | 22.91 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.46 million current US$ | 3.46 million current US$ | 3.46 million current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near European Union
- 1 Ukraine 752.52 million current US$ compare
- 2 Palestine, State of 114.78 million current US$ compare
- 3 Syrian Arab Republic 99.29 million current US$ compare
- 4 Afghanistan 80.27 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for European Union
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in European Union?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in European Union was 3.46 million current US$ in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in European Union?
- The highest recorded value was 41.47 million current US$ in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in European Union?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1978.
- How does European Union rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- European Union ranks 1st out of 2 regions with data for 2010.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in European Union?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this European Union data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.