Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 10,099 current US$ in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Kazakhstan, 1995–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 10,099 current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in 2020.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 21.4% on the previous year and down 99.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Kazakhstan peaked at 4.88 million current US$ in 2008 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1996.
That places Kazakhstan 131st out of 143 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 100,000 current US$ | — |
| 1996 | 10,000 current US$ | -90.0% |
| 1997 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 90,000 current US$ | +800.0% |
| 1999 | 1.11 million current US$ | +1133.3% |
| 2000 | 960,000 current US$ | -13.5% |
| 2001 | 950,000 current US$ | -1.0% |
| 2002 | 1.76 million current US$ | +85.3% |
| 2003 | 1.48 million current US$ | -15.9% |
| 2004 | 1.51 million current US$ | +2.0% |
| 2005 | 2.33 million current US$ | +54.3% |
| 2006 | 2.63 million current US$ | +12.9% |
| 2007 | 2.46 million current US$ | -6.5% |
| 2008 | 4.88 million current US$ | +98.4% |
| 2009 | 3.06 million current US$ | -37.3% |
| 2010 | 4.25 million current US$ | +38.9% |
| 2011 | 2.93 million current US$ | -31.1% |
| 2012 | 2.37 million current US$ | -19.1% |
| 2013 | 1.86 million current US$ | -21.7% |
| 2014 | 620,789 current US$ | -66.6% |
| 2015 | 91,919 current US$ | -85.2% |
| 2016 | 55,136 current US$ | -40.0% |
| 2017 | 18,353 current US$ | -66.7% |
| 2018 | 15,602 current US$ | -15.0% |
| 2019 | 12,850 current US$ | -17.6% |
| 2020 | 10,099 current US$ | -21.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 264,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 1.11 million current US$ | 5 |
| 2000s | 2.20 million current US$ | 950,000 current US$ | 4.88 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.22 million current US$ | 12,850 current US$ | 4.25 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 10,099 current US$ | 10,099 current US$ | 10,099 current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 128 Azerbaijan 14,290 current US$ compare
- 129 Uruguay 14,026 current US$ compare
- 130 Dominican Republic 11,838 current US$ compare
- 132 Grenada 10,000 current US$
- 132 Israel 10,000 current US$
- 132 Seychelles 10,000 current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Kazakhstan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 4.13 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4,730 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 105,758 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.43 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 203,116 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 14.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 4.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -27.89 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Kazakhstan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Kazakhstan was 10,099 current US$ in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 4.88 million current US$ in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1996.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Kazakhstan ranks 131st out of 143 countries with data for 2020.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.