Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe

Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 1,321 current US$ in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
1,321 current US$
World rank
136th
of 143 countries
All-time high
602,815 current US$
in 2012
All-time low
1,321 current US$
in 2019
Years of data
13
1993–2019

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe, 1993–2019

0200.0k400.0k600.0k1993200620191993: 20.0k current US$2000: 100.0k current US$2005: 120.0k current US$2006: 90.0k current US$2007: 30.0k current US$2008: 10.0k current US$2009: 158.2k current US$2010: 306.4k current US$2011: 454.6k current US$2012: 602.8k current US$2013: 246.3k current US$2014: 335.1k current US$2019: 1.3k current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

Sao Tome and Principe recorded 1,321 current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.

The figure is down 99.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe peaked at 602,815 current US$ in 2012 and was at its lowest, 1,321 current US$, in 2019.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 136th of 143 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled in Sao Tome and Principe, 1993 to 2019.
Year current US$ Change
1993 20,000 current US$
2000 100,000 current US$ +400.0%
2005 120,000 current US$ +20.0%
2006 90,000 current US$ -25.0%
2007 30,000 current US$ -66.7%
2008 10,000 current US$ -66.7%
2009 158,204 current US$ +1482.0%
2010 306,408 current US$ +93.7%
2011 454,611 current US$ +48.4%
2012 602,815 current US$ +32.6%
2013 246,312 current US$ -59.1%
2014 335,087 current US$ +36.0%
2019 1,321 current US$ -99.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 20,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 1
2000s 84,701 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 158,204 current US$ 6
2010s 324,426 current US$ 1,321 current US$ 602,815 current US$ 6

Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe

  1. 135 Jamaica 5,455 current US$ compare
  2. 137 Maldives 1,140 current US$ compare
  3. 138 Chile -2,582 current US$ compare
  4. 139 Barbados -10,000 current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Sao Tome and Principe

All data for Sao Tome and Principe →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe was 1,321 current US$ in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
The highest recorded value was 602,815 current US$ in 2012.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
The lowest recorded value was 1,321 current US$ in 2019.
How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 136th out of 143 countries with data for 2019.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Sao Tome and Principe?
Over the last ten years it is down 99.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/sao-tome-and-principe/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Sao Tome and Principe</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.