Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in World
World: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 4.27 billion current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in World, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
World recorded 4.27 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in 2023.
That represents a change of up 3.9% on the previous year and down 1.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in World peaked at 4.34 billion current US$ in 2013 and was at its lowest, 1.17 million current US$, in 1960.
That places World 1st out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in World, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 1.17 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 1.30 million current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1962 | 1.26 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 1963 | 2.42 million current US$ | +92.1% |
| 1964 | 2.77 million current US$ | +14.5% |
| 1965 | 3.69 million current US$ | +33.2% |
| 1966 | 5.11 million current US$ | +38.5% |
| 1967 | 4.18 million current US$ | -18.2% |
| 1968 | 12.51 million current US$ | +199.3% |
| 1969 | 13.39 million current US$ | +7.0% |
| 1970 | 14.88 million current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1971 | 18.13 million current US$ | +21.8% |
| 1972 | 30.55 million current US$ | +68.5% |
| 1973 | 40.52 million current US$ | +32.6% |
| 1974 | 73.27 million current US$ | +80.8% |
| 1975 | 101.77 million current US$ | +38.9% |
| 1976 | 105.65 million current US$ | +3.8% |
| 1977 | 165.17 million current US$ | +56.3% |
| 1978 | 192.54 million current US$ | +16.6% |
| 1979 | 248.64 million current US$ | +29.1% |
| 1980 | 284.47 million current US$ | +14.4% |
| 1981 | 264.98 million current US$ | -6.9% |
| 1982 | 327.02 million current US$ | +23.4% |
| 1983 | 333.58 million current US$ | +2.0% |
| 1984 | 307.08 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 1985 | 332.51 million current US$ | +8.3% |
| 1986 | 482.73 million current US$ | +45.2% |
| 1987 | 530.86 million current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1988 | 575.37 million current US$ | +8.4% |
| 1989 | 561.15 million current US$ | -2.5% |
| 1990 | 768.78 million current US$ | +37.0% |
| 1991 | 758.81 million current US$ | -1.3% |
| 1992 | 829.94 million current US$ | +9.4% |
| 1993 | 664.90 million current US$ | -19.9% |
| 1994 | 843.30 million current US$ | +26.8% |
| 1995 | 919.71 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 1996 | 959.39 million current US$ | +4.3% |
| 1997 | 939.83 million current US$ | -2.0% |
| 1998 | 980.31 million current US$ | +4.3% |
| 1999 | 1.02 billion current US$ | +3.7% |
| 2000 | 948.35 million current US$ | -6.7% |
| 2001 | 978.48 million current US$ | +3.2% |
| 2002 | 1.17 billion current US$ | +19.9% |
| 2003 | 1.49 billion current US$ | +27.3% |
| 2004 | 1.57 billion current US$ | +5.2% |
| 2005 | 2.11 billion current US$ | +34.2% |
| 2006 | 2.22 billion current US$ | +5.3% |
| 2007 | 2.95 billion current US$ | +33.0% |
| 2008 | 3.16 billion current US$ | +6.9% |
| 2009 | 3.20 billion current US$ | +1.3% |
| 2010 | 3.42 billion current US$ | +6.9% |
| 2011 | 3.59 billion current US$ | +4.9% |
| 2012 | 3.59 billion current US$ | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 4.34 billion current US$ | +21.0% |
| 2014 | 3.98 billion current US$ | -8.3% |
| 2015 | 3.31 billion current US$ | -16.8% |
| 2016 | 3.45 billion current US$ | +4.3% |
| 2017 | 3.13 billion current US$ | -9.3% |
| 2018 | 3.23 billion current US$ | +3.1% |
| 2019 | 3.35 billion current US$ | +3.9% |
| 2020 | 3.11 billion current US$ | -7.2% |
| 2021 | 3.49 billion current US$ | +12.1% |
| 2022 | 4.11 billion current US$ | +17.9% |
| 2023 | 4.27 billion current US$ | +3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.78 million current US$ | 1.17 million current US$ | 13.39 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 99.11 million current US$ | 14.88 million current US$ | 248.64 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 399.98 million current US$ | 264.98 million current US$ | 575.37 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 868.11 million current US$ | 664.90 million current US$ | 1.02 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.98 billion current US$ | 948.35 million current US$ | 3.20 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.54 billion current US$ | 3.13 billion current US$ | 4.34 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.75 billion current US$ | 3.11 billion current US$ | 4.27 billion current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near World
- 1 Ukraine 752.52 million current US$ compare
- 2 Palestine, State of 114.78 million current US$ compare
- 3 Syrian Arab Republic 99.29 million current US$ compare
- 4 Afghanistan 80.27 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for World
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 901.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.13 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.46 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.15 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.35 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 12.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.65 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 15.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in World?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in World was 4.27 billion current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in World?
- The highest recorded value was 4.34 billion current US$ in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in World?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.17 million current US$ in 1960.
- How does World rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- World ranks 1st out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in World?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this World data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.