Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 0.5425 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in China, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
China recorded 0.5425 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 49.6% on the previous year and down 75.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in China peaked at 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.0554 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
China ranks 117th of 142 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.0554 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.1278 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.8% |
| 1982 | 0.0831 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 1983 | 0.6221 current US$ per square kilometre | +648.7% |
| 1984 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.1% |
| 1985 | 0.3824 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.7% |
| 1986 | 0.474 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 1987 | 0.883 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.3% |
| 1988 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1989 | 0.6689 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 1990 | 0.6199 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1991 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.1% |
| 1992 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 1993 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 1994 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.3% |
| 1995 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.5% |
| 1996 | 0.9693 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1997 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.2% |
| 1998 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 1999 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2000 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2001 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2002 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2003 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2004 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 2005 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2006 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2007 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2008 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 2009 | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2010 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2011 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2012 | 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2013 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2014 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2015 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.6% |
| 2016 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2017 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2018 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2019 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2020 | 0.9659 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 2021 | 0.9456 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2022 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2023 | 0.5425 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5637 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0554 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6199 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8828 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5425 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 114 Chad 0.7521 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Paraguay 0.6471 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Guinea 0.5927 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Jamaica 0.5037 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Malaysia 0.4809 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Benin 0.4632 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in China was 0.5425 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0554 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- China ranks 117th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 75.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.