Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Dominican Republic, 1973–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Dominican Republic stood at 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 95.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Dominican Republic peaked at 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987 and was at its lowest, 0.207 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
Dominican Republic ranks 125th of 142 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1973 | 0.207 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 12.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +6000.0% |
| 1981 | 10.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1983 | 11.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1984 | 0.414 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.4% |
| 1985 | 9.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +2100.0% |
| 1986 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.7% |
| 1987 | 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +666.7% |
| 1988 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.4% |
| 1989 | 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1990 | 6.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.1% |
| 1991 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1992 | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1993 | 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1994 | 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1995 | 7.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 1996 | 9.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1997 | 7.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 1998 | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1999 | 7.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.9% |
| 2000 | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 2001 | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2002 | 8.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2003 | 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2004 | 13.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.1% |
| 2005 | 9.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2006 | 16.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.6% |
| 2007 | 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.4% |
| 2008 | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2009 | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2010 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2011 | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2012 | 5.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2013 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2014 | 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2015 | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 2016 | 0.9141 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.4% |
| 2017 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 2019 | 0.2984 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.3% |
| 2023 | 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.207 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.207 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.207 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1980s | 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.414 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 7.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2984 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 122 Algeria 0.3976 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Costa Rica 0.3873 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 124 Cote d'Ivoire 0.3147 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 126 Mongolia 0.2022 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 Suriname 0.1869 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 128 Azerbaijan 0.1729 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Dominican Republic
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 29,645 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9,516 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 24.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -8.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 22,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 218.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 498,028 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 84,623 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.63 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Dominican Republic?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Dominican Republic was 0.2456 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.207 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Dominican Republic ranks 125th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is down 95.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.