Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 145.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) stood at 145.49 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 42.9% on the previous year and up 889.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 145.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.1882 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
That places Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -0.1255 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.1004 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0.4015 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.6524 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1966 | 0.6399 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1968 | 0.6524 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0.665 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1970 | 0.6273 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1971 | -0.0251 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.0% |
| 1972 | 0.5646 current US$ per square kilometre | -2350.0% |
| 1973 | -0.1882 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0627 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.3% |
| 1975 | -0.1129 current US$ per square kilometre | -280.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0753 current US$ per square kilometre | -166.7% |
| 1977 | 0.9034 current US$ per square kilometre | +1100.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0627 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.1% |
| 1979 | 15.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +23919.9% |
| 1980 | 13.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1981 | 0.2886 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.9% |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1983 | 7.52 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0.1255 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.3% |
| 1985 | 0.1004 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0753 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1987 | 0.1757 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1988 | 0.0753 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1989 | 0.1506 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1990 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +658.3% |
| 1991 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.6% |
| 1992 | 0.7659 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.7% |
| 1993 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +718.7% |
| 1994 | 17.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.8% |
| 1995 | 13.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1996 | 12.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1997 | 12.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1998 | 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1999 | 29.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +132.6% |
| 2000 | 22 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2001 | 16.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2002 | 24.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 2003 | 24.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2004 | 22.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2005 | 23.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2006 | 22.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2007 | 20.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2008 | 22.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2009 | 19.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 2010 | 21.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2011 | 20.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2012 | 17.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2013 | 14.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 2014 | 15.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2015 | 16.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2016 | 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.3% |
| 2017 | 10.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 2018 | 10.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2019 | 11.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2020 | 10.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2021 | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2022 | 101.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +1096.4% |
| 2023 | 145.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3095 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1255 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.665 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1882 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 10.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7659 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 21.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 14.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 66.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 145.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 1 Palestine, State of 19,051 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Lebanon 4,209 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Republic of Moldova 2,297 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Ukraine 1,299 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 145.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 145.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.1882 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 889.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.