Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia recorded 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 42.9% on the previous year and up 889.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.0274 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
That places Europe & Central Asia 13th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -0.0183 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.0146 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0585 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.095 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0932 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1968 | 0.095 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0.0968 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1970 | 0.0913 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1971 | -0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0822 current US$ per square kilometre | -2350.0% |
| 1973 | -0.0274 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.3% |
| 1975 | -0.0164 current US$ per square kilometre | -280.0% |
| 1976 | 0.011 current US$ per square kilometre | -166.7% |
| 1977 | 0.1315 current US$ per square kilometre | +1100.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.1% |
| 1979 | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +23920.2% |
| 1980 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1981 | 0.042 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.9% |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1983 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0.0183 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.3% |
| 1985 | 0.0146 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1986 | 0.011 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1988 | 0.011 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0219 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1990 | 0.1663 current US$ per square kilometre | +658.3% |
| 1991 | 0.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.6% |
| 1992 | 0.1638 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.9% |
| 1993 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +715.0% |
| 1994 | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.9% |
| 1995 | 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1996 | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1997 | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1998 | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1999 | 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +132.5% |
| 2000 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 2001 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2002 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 2003 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2004 | 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2005 | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2006 | 4.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2007 | 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2008 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2009 | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 2010 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2011 | 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2012 | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2013 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 2014 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2015 | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2016 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.3% |
| 2017 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 2018 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2019 | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2020 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2021 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2022 | 21.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +1096.5% |
| 2023 | 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0451 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0183 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0968 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2481 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0274 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3197 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1638 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 10 Uganda 206.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Armenia 204.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Marshall Islands 149.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Samoa 133.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Rwanda 129 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 South Sudan 123.73 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Afghanistan 123.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia was 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0274 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 13th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 889.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.