Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Gambia
Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Gambia, 1967–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Gambia recorded 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2022.
The figure is up 9.0% on the previous year and up 396.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Gambia peaked at 379.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988 and was at its lowest, -14.82 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
Gambia ranks 41st of 142 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Gambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1967 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 19.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1983 | 90.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +360.0% |
| 1984 | 36.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.8% |
| 1985 | 83 current US$ per square kilometre | +127.0% |
| 1986 | 111.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 1987 | 139.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 1988 | 379.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +172.3% |
| 1989 | 300.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 1990 | 230.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 1991 | 160.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 1992 | 130.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1993 | 125.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1994 | 72.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.5% |
| 1995 | 44.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 1996 | 31.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 1997 | 74.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.4% |
| 1998 | -14.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -120.0% |
| 1999 | 14.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -200.0% |
| 2000 | 18.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 2001 | 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2002 | 68.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +187.5% |
| 2003 | 29.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.5% |
| 2004 | 25.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2005 | 25.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 24.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2007 | 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.0% |
| 2008 | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 2009 | 10.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.1% |
| 2010 | 12.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2011 | 28.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +123.1% |
| 2012 | 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.5% |
| 2013 | 12.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.5% |
| 2014 | 19.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 2015 | 13.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 2016 | 14.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2017 | 10.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 2018 | 28.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +169.6% |
| 2019 | 23.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 2020 | 22.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2021 | 24.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2022 | 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1980s | 145.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 379.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1990s | 86.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 230.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 24.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 24.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Gambia
- 38 Grenada 29.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Cambodia 26.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Sudan 26.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Kenya 25.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Seychelles 21.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Mali 20.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Gambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 169,331 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 52,913 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 974,422 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 15.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 11.89 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Gambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Gambia was 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Gambia?
- The highest recorded value was 379.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Gambia?
- The lowest recorded value was -14.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Gambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Gambia ranks 41st out of 142 countries with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Gambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 396.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Gambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.