Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Mexico
Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 0.1461 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Mexico, 1969–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Mexico recorded 0.1461 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 9.0% on the previous year and down 82.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Mexico peaked at 4.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, -0.002 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2016.
Mexico ranks 129th of 142 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Mexico, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0206 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.3% |
| 1982 | 0.108 current US$ per square kilometre | +2000.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0412 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1985 | 0.4167 current US$ per square kilometre | +912.5% |
| 1986 | 0.2572 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0154 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0617 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0875 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0875 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1992 | 0.1646 current US$ per square kilometre | +190.9% |
| 1994 | 0.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1995 | 0.1749 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1996 | 0.1955 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1997 | 0.1235 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.8% |
| 1998 | 0.499 current US$ per square kilometre | +304.2% |
| 1999 | 0.3292 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 2000 | 0.2263 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 2001 | 0.2058 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2002 | 0.2006 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0463 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.9% |
| 2004 | 0.1852 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2005 | 0.2726 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0617 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0257 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 2011 | 4.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +16280.0% |
| 2012 | 0.1719 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.9% |
| 2013 | 0.8334 current US$ per square kilometre | +384.8% |
| 2014 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +303.7% |
| 2015 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.2% |
| 2016 | -0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.1% |
| 2022 | 0.1605 current US$ per square kilometre | -8024.9% |
| 2023 | 0.1461 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1980s | 0.1305 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0154 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4167 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1990s | 0.2012 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.499 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 0.1511 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2726 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2010s | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2020s | 0.1533 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1461 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1605 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 126 Mongolia 0.2022 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 Suriname 0.1869 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 128 Azerbaijan 0.1729 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 130 Botswana 0.1014 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 131 Mauritania 0.0901 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 132 Uruguay 0.0801 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mexico
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 6.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,627 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 8.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -75.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 83.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 132.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 5.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.81 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Mexico?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Mexico was 0.1461 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 4.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.002 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- How does Mexico rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Mexico ranks 129th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 82.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.