Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Romania
Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Romania, 1990–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Romania is 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2004.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 77.7% on the previous year and up 1,496.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Romania peaked at 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.1742 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
That places Romania 87th out of 142 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Romania, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.0% |
| 1992 | 0.1743 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.9% |
| 1993 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +875.0% |
| 1994 | 0.2179 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.2% |
| 1995 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +1000.1% |
| 1996 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1997 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.6% |
| 1998 | 0.1742 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.2% |
| 1999 | 0.7404 current US$ per square kilometre | +325.0% |
| 2000 | 0.2177 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.6% |
| 2001 | 0.5659 current US$ per square kilometre | +160.0% |
| 2002 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +899.3% |
| 2003 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.4% |
| 2004 | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1742 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2177 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Romania
- 84 Maldives 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 85 Albania 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Brazil 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 88 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 3.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 89 Papua New Guinea 3.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Republic of Korea 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Romania
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 4.04 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.48 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.88 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 694.80 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.52 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 51.41 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 42.10 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.52 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 3.17 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 34.24 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Romania?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Romania was 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1742 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Romania rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Romania ranks 87th out of 142 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,496.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.