Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
39.91 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 20.2%
Rank
8th
of 44 groups
All-time high
49.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sub-Saharan Africa recorded 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 20.2% on the previous year and down 8.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa peaked at 49.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 44 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.006 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0343 current US$ per square kilometre | +475.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0551 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0889 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 1967 | 0.1132 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1968 | 0.4627 current US$ per square kilometre | +308.8% |
| 1969 | 0.426 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1970 | 0.3421 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 1971 | 0.4707 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.6% |
| 1972 | 0.644 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 1973 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.1% |
| 1974 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.5% |
| 1975 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 1976 | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1977 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.0% |
| 1978 | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1979 | 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1980 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1981 | 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1982 | 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1983 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1984 | 8.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1985 | 9.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1986 | 13.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.8% |
| 1987 | 15.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1988 | 15.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1989 | 15.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1990 | 20.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1991 | 20.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1992 | 22.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1993 | 15.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
| 1994 | 17.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1995 | 19.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1996 | 19.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1997 | 19.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1998 | 19.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1999 | 17.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2000 | 15.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2001 | 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2002 | 21.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.3% |
| 2003 | 27.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 2004 | 29.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2005 | 33.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2006 | 36.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2007 | 42.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 2008 | 48.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2009 | 42.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2010 | 44.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2011 | 49.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2012 | 39.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 2013 | 43.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2014 | 39.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2015 | 27.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2016 | 25.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2017 | 30.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2018 | 32.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2019 | 32.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2020 | 30.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2021 | 33.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2022 | 33.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2023 | 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.132 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4627 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3421 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 19.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 31.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 36.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 34.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa
- 5 Malawi 549.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Syria 540.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Haiti 268.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Nepal 230.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Jordan 229.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Uganda 206.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Armenia 204.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa was 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 49.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.