Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in IBRD only
IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2022. ▲ Rising
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in IBRD only, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in IBRD only is 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of up 142.4% on the previous year and up 23.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in IBRD only peaked at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 1970.
IBRD only ranks 29th of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 53 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +20.2% |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +49.3% |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +21.7% |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +30.7% |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +20.3% |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +41.0% |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +16.6% |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -43.1% |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +38.1% |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4.5% |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +6.5% |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +23.9% |
| 1988 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1989 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +0.1% |
| 1990 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +25.4% |
| 1991 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +7.7% |
| 1992 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +33.0% |
| 1993 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -20.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +47.4% |
| 1995 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1996 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1997 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +34.9% |
| 2000 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -22.5% |
| 2001 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2002 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +18.5% |
| 2004 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -27.1% |
| 2005 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2006 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 2007 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +32.7% |
| 2008 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -37.3% |
| 2009 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -26.4% |
| 2010 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2011 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2012 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.6% |
| 2013 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +90.3% |
| 2014 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -53.8% |
| 2015 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +0.4% |
| 2016 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4.6% |
| 2017 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2018 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2019 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2020 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 2021 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 2022 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +142.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 3 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
- 26 Haiti 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 27 Jordan 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 28 Burkina Faso 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 29 Zambia 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 30 Burundi 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 31 Armenia 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 32 Kosovo 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More aid effectiveness data for IBRD only
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 312.16 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 136.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.62 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 14.43 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 676.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.05 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.49 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 887.01 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 783.59 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.79 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in IBRD only?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in IBRD only was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1999.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1970.
- How does IBRD only rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- IBRD only ranks 29th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.