Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per was 10.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1987–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 10.84 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 15.3% on the previous year and down 30.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 71.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1987.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +5068.4% |
| 1989 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.9% |
| 1990 | 7.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.7% |
| 1991 | 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1992 | 8.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1993 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1994 | 8.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1995 | 9.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1996 | 14.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.1% |
| 1997 | 10.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1998 | 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1999 | 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2000 | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 2001 | 30.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +315.8% |
| 2002 | 13.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.8% |
| 2003 | 17.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2004 | 26.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 2005 | 42.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 2006 | 18.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 2007 | 39.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.5% |
| 2008 | 57.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.7% |
| 2009 | 71.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 2010 | 62.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2011 | 36.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 2012 | 15.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.5% |
| 2013 | 22.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 2014 | 8.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 2015 | 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 2016 | 5.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2017 | 9.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.5% |
| 2018 | 7.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 2019 | 8.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2020 | 9.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2021 | 12.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 2022 | 10.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1990s | 9.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 32.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 71.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 4 Lebanon 1,113 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Cape Verde 563.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Guatemala 341.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Lesotho 321.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Costa Rica 296.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Antigua and Barbuda 293.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Senegal 134.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 10.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 71.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.