Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per was 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in OECD members, 1987–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
OECD members recorded 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in 2022.
The figure is up 10.0% on the previous year and up 307.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in OECD members peaked at 8.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, -0.5159 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2015.
OECD members ranks 33rd of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 0.0171 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.1255 current US$ per square kilometre | +635.0% |
| 1989 | 0.5081 current US$ per square kilometre | +305.0% |
| 1990 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.8% |
| 1991 | 3.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +238.3% |
| 1992 | 5.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 1993 | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 1994 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1995 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.7% |
| 1996 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 1997 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1998 | 0.7813 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.9% |
| 1999 | 0.7929 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2000 | 0.4921 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 2001 | 0.6881 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.8% |
| 2002 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.3% |
| 2003 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2004 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 2005 | 0.7123 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 2006 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +472.5% |
| 2007 | 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2008 | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.2% |
| 2009 | 8.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 2010 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.6% |
| 2011 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.2% |
| 2012 | 0.6129 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 2013 | 0.8901 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.2% |
| 2014 | 0.2953 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.8% |
| 2015 | -0.5159 current US$ per square kilometre | -274.7% |
| 2016 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -314.4% |
| 2017 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.0% |
| 2018 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.8% |
| 2019 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2020 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 2021 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2022 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2169 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0171 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5081 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1990s | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7813 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4921 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5159 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 30 Peru 31.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 29.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Timor-Leste 27.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Burundi 24.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Mozambique 22.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Trinidad and Tobago 21.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Philippines 20.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in OECD members was 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 8.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.5159 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
- OECD members ranks 33rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 307.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.