Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per was 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), 1987–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 26.4% on the previous year and down 31.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 40.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.6951 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1987.
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 22nd of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 0.6951 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.8346 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1989 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +277.6% |
| 1990 | 6.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.5% |
| 1991 | 5.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1992 | 6.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1993 | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.9% |
| 1994 | 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 1995 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 1996 | 10.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +170.6% |
| 1997 | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1998 | 7.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1999 | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2000 | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.1% |
| 2001 | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2002 | 7.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.7% |
| 2003 | 7.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2004 | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2005 | 25.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +214.9% |
| 2006 | 12.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
| 2007 | 21.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.6% |
| 2008 | 31.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.3% |
| 2009 | 40.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 2010 | 32.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 2011 | 19.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.2% |
| 2012 | 9.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 2013 | 15.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 2014 | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.4% |
| 2015 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.5% |
| 2016 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2017 | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.8% |
| 2018 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 2019 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 2020 | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2021 | 8.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.0% |
| 2022 | 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6951 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1990s | 6.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 16.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 19 Rwanda 79.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Jordan 77.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Syrian Arab Republic 62.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Malta 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Saint Lucia 57.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Samoa 55.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Hungary 48.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.53 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 427.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 511.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.46 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.18 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.07 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 306.28 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) was 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 40.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6951 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 22nd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.