Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Bangladesh
Bangladesh: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was 6.95 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Bangladesh, 1973–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Bangladesh stood at 6.95 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 120.8% on the previous year and up 8.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Bangladesh peaked at 223.24 % change on previous year in 2008 and was at its lowest, -69.28 % change on previous year, in 2007.
Bangladesh ranks 58th of 136 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Bangladesh, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1973 | -62.72 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 88.42 % change on previous year | -241.0% |
| 1975 | 51.56 % change on previous year | -41.7% |
| 1976 | -37.39 % change on previous year | -172.5% |
| 1977 | 26.34 % change on previous year | -170.5% |
| 1978 | 14.6 % change on previous year | -44.6% |
| 1979 | 49.13 % change on previous year | +236.6% |
| 1980 | -29.92 % change on previous year | -160.9% |
| 1981 | -10.41 % change on previous year | -65.2% |
| 1982 | -11.26 % change on previous year | +8.1% |
| 1983 | -18.8 % change on previous year | +67.0% |
| 1984 | -38.82 % change on previous year | +106.5% |
| 1985 | 53.72 % change on previous year | -238.4% |
| 1986 | 34.11 % change on previous year | -36.5% |
| 1987 | 86.19 % change on previous year | +152.7% |
| 1988 | -58.73 % change on previous year | -168.1% |
| 1989 | 35.13 % change on previous year | -159.8% |
| 1990 | 12.48 % change on previous year | -64.5% |
| 1991 | 37.45 % change on previous year | +200.0% |
| 1992 | 32.66 % change on previous year | -12.8% |
| 1993 | -43.88 % change on previous year | -234.4% |
| 1994 | -5.93 % change on previous year | -86.5% |
| 1995 | 4.79 % change on previous year | -180.9% |
| 1996 | 6.96 % change on previous year | +45.1% |
| 1997 | 16.79 % change on previous year | +141.4% |
| 1998 | -39.38 % change on previous year | -334.5% |
| 1999 | 25.66 % change on previous year | -165.2% |
| 2000 | 26.54 % change on previous year | +3.4% |
| 2001 | -10.89 % change on previous year | -141.1% |
| 2002 | -47.32 % change on previous year | +334.4% |
| 2003 | 134.51 % change on previous year | -384.3% |
| 2004 | -24.04 % change on previous year | -117.9% |
| 2005 | -10.29 % change on previous year | -57.2% |
| 2006 | 60.65 % change on previous year | -689.5% |
| 2007 | -69.28 % change on previous year | -214.2% |
| 2008 | 223.24 % change on previous year | -422.2% |
| 2009 | 21.83 % change on previous year | -90.2% |
| 2010 | -21.9 % change on previous year | -200.3% |
| 2011 | -7 % change on previous year | -68.0% |
| 2012 | 23.55 % change on previous year | -436.1% |
| 2013 | 6.42 % change on previous year | -72.7% |
| 2014 | 10.74 % change on previous year | +67.1% |
| 2015 | -32.26 % change on previous year | -400.5% |
| 2016 | -9.75 % change on previous year | -69.8% |
| 2017 | 55.83 % change on previous year | -672.9% |
| 2018 | 9.1 % change on previous year | -83.7% |
| 2019 | -0.9265 % change on previous year | -110.2% |
| 2020 | 7.63 % change on previous year | -923.7% |
| 2021 | -0.4951 % change on previous year | -106.5% |
| 2022 | -33.4 % change on previous year | +6647.2% |
| 2023 | 6.95 % change on previous year | -120.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 18.56 % change on previous year | -62.72 % change on previous year | 88.42 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 1980s | 4.12 % change on previous year | -58.73 % change on previous year | 86.19 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.76 % change on previous year | -43.88 % change on previous year | 37.45 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 30.49 % change on previous year | -69.28 % change on previous year | 223.24 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.38 % change on previous year | -32.26 % change on previous year | 55.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -4.83 % change on previous year | -33.4 % change on previous year | 7.63 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bangladesh
- 55 Slovakia 11.11 % change on previous year compare
- 56 Mozambique 7.81 % change on previous year compare
- 57 North Macedonia 7.68 % change on previous year compare
- 59 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 6.45 % change on previous year compare
- 60 Ghana 5.83 % change on previous year compare
- 61 Timor-Leste 5.27 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bangladesh
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 2.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 196.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 176.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 155.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 71.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Bangladesh?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Bangladesh was 6.95 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Bangladesh?
- The highest recorded value was 223.24 % change on previous year in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Bangladesh?
- The lowest recorded value was -69.28 % change on previous year in 2007.
- How does Bangladesh rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Bangladesh ranks 58th out of 136 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Bangladesh?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.