Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA total
IDA total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was -22.73 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA total, 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA total is -22.73 % change on previous year, measured in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 52 years on record.
The figure is down 206.1% on the previous year and down 23.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA total peaked at 91.48 % change on previous year in 1972 and was at its lowest, -22.73 % change on previous year, in 2022.
IDA total ranks 33rd of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA total, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 14.85 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 91.48 % change on previous year | +515.9% |
| 1973 | 12.63 % change on previous year | -86.2% |
| 1974 | 24.39 % change on previous year | +93.2% |
| 1975 | 83.13 % change on previous year | +240.8% |
| 1976 | -4.4 % change on previous year | -105.3% |
| 1977 | 32.36 % change on previous year | -835.3% |
| 1978 | 2.83 % change on previous year | -91.3% |
| 1979 | 59.44 % change on previous year | +2001.7% |
| 1980 | -1.3 % change on previous year | -102.2% |
| 1981 | -14.82 % change on previous year | +1037.4% |
| 1982 | 2.57 % change on previous year | -117.3% |
| 1983 | -8.71 % change on previous year | -439.4% |
| 1984 | -10.38 % change on previous year | +19.1% |
| 1985 | 10.18 % change on previous year | -198.0% |
| 1986 | 45.68 % change on previous year | +348.8% |
| 1987 | 1.31 % change on previous year | -97.1% |
| 1988 | 28.18 % change on previous year | +2051.6% |
| 1989 | -1.77 % change on previous year | -106.3% |
| 1990 | 19.62 % change on previous year | -1210.4% |
| 1991 | 21.37 % change on previous year | +8.9% |
| 1992 | -8.87 % change on previous year | -141.5% |
| 1993 | -20.83 % change on previous year | +134.8% |
| 1994 | -15.83 % change on previous year | -24.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0672 % change on previous year | -100.4% |
| 1996 | 14.85 % change on previous year | +22011.8% |
| 1997 | -17.52 % change on previous year | -217.9% |
| 1998 | -13.47 % change on previous year | -23.1% |
| 1999 | 4.91 % change on previous year | -136.4% |
| 2000 | 18.77 % change on previous year | +282.6% |
| 2001 | -9.26 % change on previous year | -149.4% |
| 2002 | 3.36 % change on previous year | -136.2% |
| 2003 | 66.23 % change on previous year | +1873.3% |
| 2004 | 3.1 % change on previous year | -95.3% |
| 2005 | 16.85 % change on previous year | +444.1% |
| 2006 | 7.82 % change on previous year | -53.6% |
| 2007 | 9.83 % change on previous year | +25.7% |
| 2008 | 8.04 % change on previous year | -18.3% |
| 2009 | -8 % change on previous year | -199.5% |
| 2010 | 0.8038 % change on previous year | -110.1% |
| 2011 | 37.22 % change on previous year | +4530.7% |
| 2012 | -18.42 % change on previous year | -149.5% |
| 2013 | 12.79 % change on previous year | -169.4% |
| 2014 | -6.5 % change on previous year | -150.8% |
| 2015 | -15.76 % change on previous year | +142.6% |
| 2016 | 1.1 % change on previous year | -107.0% |
| 2017 | 21.53 % change on previous year | +1860.2% |
| 2018 | 13.48 % change on previous year | -37.4% |
| 2019 | -7.81 % change on previous year | -157.9% |
| 2020 | 2.21 % change on previous year | -128.3% |
| 2021 | 21.41 % change on previous year | +869.2% |
| 2022 | -22.73 % change on previous year | -206.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 35.19 % change on previous year | -4.4 % change on previous year | 91.48 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 5.09 % change on previous year | -14.82 % change on previous year | 45.68 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.57 % change on previous year | -20.83 % change on previous year | 21.37 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.67 % change on previous year | -9.26 % change on previous year | 66.23 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.84 % change on previous year | -18.42 % change on previous year | 37.22 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2988 % change on previous year | -22.73 % change on previous year | 21.41 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA total
- 30 Sudan 31.85 % change on previous year compare
- 31 Cape Verde 31.64 % change on previous year compare
- 32 Nepal 31.54 % change on previous year compare
- 33 Mexico 29.62 % change on previous year compare
- 34 Belize 29.49 % change on previous year compare
- 35 Central African Republic 28.92 % change on previous year compare
- 36 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 25.95 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA total
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 130.76 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.76 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 862.26 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.52 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.37 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.91 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 481.62 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.19 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA total?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA total was -22.73 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in IDA total?
- The highest recorded value was 91.48 % change on previous year in 1972.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in IDA total?
- The lowest recorded value was -22.73 % change on previous year in 2022.
- How does IDA total rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- IDA total ranks 33rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in IDA total?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA total data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.