Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was -8.29 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
-8.29 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 24.0%
Rank
25th
of 46 groups
All-time high
157.84 % change on previous year
in 1962
All-time low
-28.98 % change on previous year
in 2016
Years of data
61
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Low & middle income recorded -8.29 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in 2023.
The figure is up 24.0% on the previous year and down 207.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Low & middle income peaked at 157.84 % change on previous year in 1962 and was at its lowest, -28.98 % change on previous year, in 2016.
Low & middle income ranks 25th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 85.45 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | 157.84 % change on previous year | +84.7% |
| 1963 | 152.47 % change on previous year | -3.4% |
| 1964 | 105.87 % change on previous year | -30.6% |
| 1965 | 21.58 % change on previous year | -79.6% |
| 1968 | 59.09 % change on previous year | +173.8% |
| 1969 | 33 % change on previous year | -44.1% |
| 1970 | 3.24 % change on previous year | -90.2% |
| 1971 | 7.86 % change on previous year | +142.4% |
| 1972 | 60.17 % change on previous year | +665.8% |
| 1973 | 43.36 % change on previous year | -27.9% |
| 1974 | 60.99 % change on previous year | +40.7% |
| 1975 | 60.7 % change on previous year | -0.5% |
| 1976 | 5.13 % change on previous year | -91.6% |
| 1977 | 21.83 % change on previous year | +325.8% |
| 1978 | -2.14 % change on previous year | -109.8% |
| 1979 | 39.14 % change on previous year | -1927.4% |
| 1980 | 8.2 % change on previous year | -79.1% |
| 1981 | -14.87 % change on previous year | -281.4% |
| 1982 | -2.48 % change on previous year | -83.3% |
| 1983 | -10.5 % change on previous year | +323.1% |
| 1984 | 0.2705 % change on previous year | -102.6% |
| 1985 | 9.25 % change on previous year | +3320.7% |
| 1986 | 33.6 % change on previous year | +263.2% |
| 1987 | 15.98 % change on previous year | -52.4% |
| 1988 | 13.62 % change on previous year | -14.8% |
| 1989 | 26.64 % change on previous year | +95.7% |
| 1990 | 6.87 % change on previous year | -74.2% |
| 1991 | 7.62 % change on previous year | +10.9% |
| 1992 | 20.16 % change on previous year | +164.6% |
| 1993 | -25.77 % change on previous year | -227.8% |
| 1994 | 5.56 % change on previous year | -121.6% |
| 1995 | -14.78 % change on previous year | -365.8% |
| 1996 | 18.47 % change on previous year | -225.0% |
| 1997 | -13.54 % change on previous year | -173.3% |
| 1998 | -13.85 % change on previous year | +2.3% |
| 1999 | 11.74 % change on previous year | -184.7% |
| 2000 | 8.18 % change on previous year | -30.3% |
| 2001 | -2.8 % change on previous year | -134.2% |
| 2002 | 5.44 % change on previous year | -294.4% |
| 2003 | 40.15 % change on previous year | +637.7% |
| 2004 | 15.69 % change on previous year | -60.9% |
| 2005 | 8.04 % change on previous year | -48.8% |
| 2006 | 28.49 % change on previous year | +254.5% |
| 2007 | 2.74 % change on previous year | -90.4% |
| 2008 | 7.2 % change on previous year | +163.1% |
| 2009 | -4.23 % change on previous year | -158.8% |
| 2010 | -2.5 % change on previous year | -40.9% |
| 2011 | 24.96 % change on previous year | -1097.7% |
| 2012 | -0.0025 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2013 | 7.7 % change on previous year | -308875.0% |
| 2014 | 10.8 % change on previous year | +40.3% |
| 2015 | 11.27 % change on previous year | +4.3% |
| 2016 | -28.98 % change on previous year | -357.3% |
| 2017 | 10.1 % change on previous year | -134.9% |
| 2018 | 0.1991 % change on previous year | -98.0% |
| 2019 | -10 % change on previous year | -5121.8% |
| 2020 | 3.42 % change on previous year | -134.2% |
| 2021 | 9.21 % change on previous year | +169.7% |
| 2022 | -10.91 % change on previous year | -218.4% |
| 2023 | -8.29 % change on previous year | -24.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 87.9 % change on previous year | 21.58 % change on previous year | 157.84 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 1970s | 30.03 % change on previous year | -2.14 % change on previous year | 60.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.97 % change on previous year | -14.87 % change on previous year | 33.6 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2486 % change on previous year | -25.77 % change on previous year | 20.16 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.89 % change on previous year | -4.23 % change on previous year | 40.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.35 % change on previous year | -28.98 % change on previous year | 24.96 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.64 % change on previous year | -10.91 % change on previous year | 9.21 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 22 Nicaragua 46.02 % change on previous year compare
- 23 Lebanon 43.12 % change on previous year compare
- 24 Malawi 41.6 % change on previous year compare
- 25 Gambia 40.38 % change on previous year compare
- 26 Eswatini 39.79 % change on previous year compare
- 27 Republic of Moldova 39.72 % change on previous year compare
- 28 Senegal 36.76 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Low & middle income was -8.29 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 157.84 % change on previous year in 1962.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -28.98 % change on previous year in 2016.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Low & middle income ranks 25th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 207.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.