Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was -19.23 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) recorded -19.23 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in 2022.
The figure is down 425.5% on the previous year and down 173.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) peaked at 184.68 % change on previous year in 1974 and was at its lowest, -56.19 % change on previous year, in 1990.
That places South Asia (IDA & IBRD) 32nd out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 21.52 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 87.81 % change on previous year | +308.1% |
| 1973 | -38.76 % change on previous year | -144.1% |
| 1974 | 184.68 % change on previous year | -576.5% |
| 1975 | 79.26 % change on previous year | -57.1% |
| 1976 | -30.86 % change on previous year | -138.9% |
| 1977 | 4.78 % change on previous year | -115.5% |
| 1978 | 9.99 % change on previous year | +109.1% |
| 1979 | 53.94 % change on previous year | +439.8% |
| 1980 | -15.47 % change on previous year | -128.7% |
| 1981 | -21.34 % change on previous year | +37.9% |
| 1982 | 8.11 % change on previous year | -138.0% |
| 1983 | -15.91 % change on previous year | -296.1% |
| 1984 | 0.367 % change on previous year | -102.3% |
| 1985 | -2.22 % change on previous year | -703.5% |
| 1986 | 39.93 % change on previous year | -1902.7% |
| 1987 | -12.23 % change on previous year | -130.6% |
| 1988 | -13.45 % change on previous year | +10.0% |
| 1989 | 161.71 % change on previous year | -1302.3% |
| 1990 | -56.19 % change on previous year | -134.7% |
| 1991 | 7.85 % change on previous year | -114.0% |
| 1992 | 14.39 % change on previous year | +83.2% |
| 1993 | -14.49 % change on previous year | -200.7% |
| 1994 | 17.53 % change on previous year | -221.0% |
| 1995 | -14.41 % change on previous year | -182.2% |
| 1996 | -3.61 % change on previous year | -74.9% |
| 1997 | -24.52 % change on previous year | +579.4% |
| 1998 | -25.67 % change on previous year | +4.7% |
| 1999 | -0.2138 % change on previous year | -99.2% |
| 2000 | 20.27 % change on previous year | -9577.4% |
| 2001 | 18.94 % change on previous year | -6.6% |
| 2002 | -23.66 % change on previous year | -224.9% |
| 2003 | 57.25 % change on previous year | -342.0% |
| 2004 | 7.84 % change on previous year | -86.3% |
| 2005 | 21.38 % change on previous year | +172.8% |
| 2006 | -7.1 % change on previous year | -133.2% |
| 2007 | -25.45 % change on previous year | +258.3% |
| 2008 | 49.58 % change on previous year | -294.8% |
| 2009 | 11.76 % change on previous year | -76.3% |
| 2010 | 14.31 % change on previous year | +21.6% |
| 2011 | 1.53 % change on previous year | -89.3% |
| 2012 | -7.03 % change on previous year | -558.4% |
| 2013 | 12.46 % change on previous year | -277.3% |
| 2014 | 9.5 % change on previous year | -23.8% |
| 2015 | -26.27 % change on previous year | -376.6% |
| 2016 | -6.7 % change on previous year | -74.5% |
| 2017 | 18.36 % change on previous year | -374.0% |
| 2018 | 15.57 % change on previous year | -15.2% |
| 2019 | -6.01 % change on previous year | -138.6% |
| 2020 | -8.24 % change on previous year | +37.0% |
| 2021 | 5.91 % change on previous year | -171.7% |
| 2022 | -19.23 % change on previous year | -425.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 41.37 % change on previous year | -38.76 % change on previous year | 184.68 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 12.95 % change on previous year | -21.34 % change on previous year | 161.71 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -9.93 % change on previous year | -56.19 % change on previous year | 17.53 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.08 % change on previous year | -25.45 % change on previous year | 57.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.57 % change on previous year | -26.27 % change on previous year | 18.36 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -7.19 % change on previous year | -19.23 % change on previous year | 5.91 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
- 29 Romania 32.05 % change on previous year compare
- 30 Sudan 31.85 % change on previous year compare
- 31 Cape Verde 31.64 % change on previous year compare
- 32 Nepal 31.54 % change on previous year compare
- 33 Mexico 29.62 % change on previous year compare
- 34 Belize 29.49 % change on previous year compare
- 35 Central African Republic 28.92 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 56.24 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 5.77 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 314.09 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.06 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 126.37 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 975.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 294.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 683.19 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 148.76 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.50 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) was -19.23 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- The highest recorded value was 184.68 % change on previous year in 1974.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- The lowest recorded value was -56.19 % change on previous year in 1990.
- How does South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 32nd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 173.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia (IDA & IBRD) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.