Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was 2.84 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Zimbabwe, 1968–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 2.84 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in 2023.
The figure is up 109.1% on the previous year and up 139.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Zimbabwe peaked at 250 % change on previous year in 1968 and was at its lowest, -57.14 % change on previous year, in 1972.
Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 136 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 250 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | -28.57 % change on previous year | -111.4% |
| 1972 | -57.14 % change on previous year | +100.0% |
| 1981 | -4.1 % change on previous year | -92.8% |
| 1982 | -8.09 % change on previous year | +97.5% |
| 1983 | 50.94 % change on previous year | -729.6% |
| 1984 | 27.39 % change on previous year | -46.2% |
| 1985 | 21.04 % change on previous year | -23.2% |
| 1986 | -11.39 % change on previous year | -154.1% |
| 1987 | 57.84 % change on previous year | -607.8% |
| 1988 | -29.84 % change on previous year | -151.6% |
| 1989 | -5.67 % change on previous year | -81.0% |
| 1990 | 66.9 % change on previous year | -1279.1% |
| 1991 | -0.7978 % change on previous year | -101.2% |
| 1992 | 79.01 % change on previous year | -10003.1% |
| 1993 | -44.55 % change on previous year | -156.4% |
| 1994 | -5.14 % change on previous year | -88.5% |
| 1995 | -14.64 % change on previous year | +184.7% |
| 1996 | 24.02 % change on previous year | -264.1% |
| 1997 | -36.28 % change on previous year | -251.1% |
| 1998 | -13.8 % change on previous year | -62.0% |
| 1999 | -3.19 % change on previous year | -76.9% |
| 2000 | -22.61 % change on previous year | +608.3% |
| 2001 | -44.42 % change on previous year | +96.5% |
| 2002 | 0.4866 % change on previous year | -101.1% |
| 2003 | 22.64 % change on previous year | +4552.4% |
| 2004 | 27.15 % change on previous year | +19.9% |
| 2005 | 17.16 % change on previous year | -36.8% |
| 2006 | 18.03 % change on previous year | +5.1% |
| 2007 | 10.67 % change on previous year | -40.8% |
| 2008 | 30.59 % change on previous year | +186.8% |
| 2009 | 14.1 % change on previous year | -53.9% |
| 2010 | 3.4 % change on previous year | -75.9% |
| 2011 | 27.03 % change on previous year | +694.0% |
| 2012 | 3.06 % change on previous year | -88.7% |
| 2013 | -7.16 % change on previous year | -334.3% |
| 2014 | -5.96 % change on previous year | -16.9% |
| 2015 | -15.93 % change on previous year | +167.4% |
| 2016 | -2.32 % change on previous year | -85.4% |
| 2017 | 30.23 % change on previous year | -1403.9% |
| 2018 | 14.56 % change on previous year | -51.8% |
| 2019 | 14.38 % change on previous year | -1.2% |
| 2020 | -3.8 % change on previous year | -126.4% |
| 2021 | 2.46 % change on previous year | -164.8% |
| 2022 | -31.32 % change on previous year | -1372.6% |
| 2023 | 2.84 % change on previous year | -109.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 110.71 % change on previous year | -28.57 % change on previous year | 250 % change on previous year | 2 |
| 1970s | -57.14 % change on previous year | -57.14 % change on previous year | -57.14 % change on previous year | 1 |
| 1980s | 10.9 % change on previous year | -29.84 % change on previous year | 57.84 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1990s | 5.15 % change on previous year | -44.55 % change on previous year | 79.01 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.38 % change on previous year | -44.42 % change on previous year | 30.59 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.13 % change on previous year | -15.93 % change on previous year | 30.23 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -7.46 % change on previous year | -31.32 % change on previous year | 2.84 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 61 Timor-Leste 5.27 % change on previous year compare
- 62 Haiti 4.35 % change on previous year compare
- 63 Liberia 4.26 % change on previous year compare
- 65 Thailand 2.71 % change on previous year compare
- 66 Algeria 2.66 % change on previous year compare
- 67 Ethiopia 1.13 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Zimbabwe was 2.84 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 250 % change on previous year in 1968.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was -57.14 % change on previous year in 1972.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Zimbabwe ranks 64th out of 136 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 139.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.