Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in IBRD only
IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 530.05 million current US$ in 2022. ▲ Rising
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in IBRD only, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in IBRD only is 530.05 million current US$, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.3% on the previous year and up 31.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in IBRD only peaked at 702.63 million current US$ in 2006 and was at its lowest, 14.78 million current US$, in 1970.
IBRD only ranks 16th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 53 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 14.78 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 21.56 million current US$ | +45.9% |
| 1972 | 22.98 million current US$ | +6.6% |
| 1973 | 53.15 million current US$ | +131.3% |
| 1974 | 87.36 million current US$ | +64.4% |
| 1975 | 163.23 million current US$ | +86.8% |
| 1976 | 172.79 million current US$ | +5.9% |
| 1977 | 197.76 million current US$ | +14.5% |
| 1978 | 168.48 million current US$ | -14.8% |
| 1979 | 184.48 million current US$ | +9.5% |
| 1980 | 219.41 million current US$ | +18.9% |
| 1981 | 172.27 million current US$ | -21.5% |
| 1982 | 165.74 million current US$ | -3.8% |
| 1983 | 138.37 million current US$ | -16.5% |
| 1984 | 150.68 million current US$ | +8.9% |
| 1985 | 126.20 million current US$ | -16.2% |
| 1986 | 208.16 million current US$ | +64.9% |
| 1987 | 155.53 million current US$ | -25.3% |
| 1988 | 225.95 million current US$ | +45.3% |
| 1989 | 366.83 million current US$ | +62.4% |
| 1990 | 311.77 million current US$ | -15.0% |
| 1991 | 323.98 million current US$ | +3.9% |
| 1992 | 536.68 million current US$ | +65.7% |
| 1993 | 355.20 million current US$ | -33.8% |
| 1994 | 477.44 million current US$ | +34.4% |
| 1995 | 393.17 million current US$ | -17.7% |
| 1996 | 467.16 million current US$ | +18.8% |
| 1997 | 402.92 million current US$ | -13.8% |
| 1998 | 277.46 million current US$ | -31.1% |
| 1999 | 306.24 million current US$ | +10.4% |
| 2000 | 336.96 million current US$ | +10.0% |
| 2001 | 316.39 million current US$ | -6.1% |
| 2002 | 280.37 million current US$ | -11.4% |
| 2003 | 351.26 million current US$ | +25.3% |
| 2004 | 445.16 million current US$ | +26.7% |
| 2005 | 372.44 million current US$ | -16.3% |
| 2006 | 702.63 million current US$ | +88.7% |
| 2007 | 445.72 million current US$ | -36.6% |
| 2008 | 432.11 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 2009 | 389.26 million current US$ | -9.9% |
| 2010 | 358.69 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 2011 | 447.04 million current US$ | +24.6% |
| 2012 | 403.78 million current US$ | -9.7% |
| 2013 | 423.04 million current US$ | +4.8% |
| 2014 | 399.34 million current US$ | -5.6% |
| 2015 | 280.85 million current US$ | -29.7% |
| 2016 | 310.07 million current US$ | +10.4% |
| 2017 | 322.47 million current US$ | +4.0% |
| 2018 | 354.43 million current US$ | +9.9% |
| 2019 | 353.07 million current US$ | -0.4% |
| 2020 | 376.95 million current US$ | +6.8% |
| 2021 | 455.66 million current US$ | +20.9% |
| 2022 | 530.05 million current US$ | +16.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 108.66 million current US$ | 14.78 million current US$ | 197.76 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 192.91 million current US$ | 126.20 million current US$ | 366.83 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 385.20 million current US$ | 277.46 million current US$ | 536.68 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 407.23 million current US$ | 280.37 million current US$ | 702.63 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 365.28 million current US$ | 280.85 million current US$ | 447.04 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 454.22 million current US$ | 376.95 million current US$ | 530.05 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
- 13 Kenya 45.92 million current US$ compare
- 14 Uganda 45.51 million current US$ compare
- 15 Mali 44.50 million current US$ compare
- 16 Türkiye 41.96 million current US$ compare
- 17 Palestine, State of 41.33 million current US$ compare
- 18 Zambia 39.66 million current US$ compare
- 19 Myanmar 39.05 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for IBRD only
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 312.16 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 136.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.62 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 14.43 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 676.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.05 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.49 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 887.01 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 783.59 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.79 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in IBRD only?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in IBRD only was 530.05 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 702.63 million current US$ in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.78 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does IBRD only rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- IBRD only ranks 16th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is up 31.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.