Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Late-demographic dividend
Late-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 162.88 million current US$ in 2022. ▲ Rising
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Late-demographic dividend, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Late-demographic dividend is 162.88 million current US$, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 3.9% on the previous year and up 4.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Late-demographic dividend peaked at 404.32 million current US$ in 1992 and was at its lowest, 5.63 million current US$, in 1970.
Late-demographic dividend ranks 27th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 53 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Late-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 5.63 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 9.73 million current US$ | +72.8% |
| 1972 | 10.70 million current US$ | +10.0% |
| 1973 | 40.33 million current US$ | +276.9% |
| 1974 | 33.71 million current US$ | -16.4% |
| 1975 | 72.50 million current US$ | +115.1% |
| 1976 | 107.66 million current US$ | +48.5% |
| 1977 | 139.48 million current US$ | +29.6% |
| 1978 | 98.11 million current US$ | -29.7% |
| 1979 | 108.38 million current US$ | +10.5% |
| 1980 | 122.93 million current US$ | +13.4% |
| 1981 | 99.69 million current US$ | -18.9% |
| 1982 | 99.27 million current US$ | -0.4% |
| 1983 | 84.98 million current US$ | -14.4% |
| 1984 | 98.58 million current US$ | +16.0% |
| 1985 | 84.28 million current US$ | -14.5% |
| 1986 | 101.09 million current US$ | +19.9% |
| 1987 | 69.50 million current US$ | -31.2% |
| 1988 | 94.44 million current US$ | +35.9% |
| 1989 | 100.25 million current US$ | +6.2% |
| 1990 | 159.31 million current US$ | +58.9% |
| 1991 | 152.92 million current US$ | -4.0% |
| 1992 | 404.32 million current US$ | +164.4% |
| 1993 | 158.26 million current US$ | -60.9% |
| 1994 | 173.36 million current US$ | +9.5% |
| 1995 | 163.43 million current US$ | -5.7% |
| 1996 | 184.74 million current US$ | +13.0% |
| 1997 | 160.37 million current US$ | -13.2% |
| 1998 | 142.15 million current US$ | -11.4% |
| 1999 | 153.49 million current US$ | +8.0% |
| 2000 | 181.14 million current US$ | +18.0% |
| 2001 | 192.30 million current US$ | +6.2% |
| 2002 | 158.56 million current US$ | -17.5% |
| 2003 | 187.80 million current US$ | +18.4% |
| 2004 | 257.86 million current US$ | +37.3% |
| 2005 | 215.40 million current US$ | -16.5% |
| 2006 | 229.08 million current US$ | +6.4% |
| 2007 | 242.01 million current US$ | +5.6% |
| 2008 | 235.94 million current US$ | -2.5% |
| 2009 | 189.90 million current US$ | -19.5% |
| 2010 | 159.44 million current US$ | -16.0% |
| 2011 | 187.48 million current US$ | +17.6% |
| 2012 | 156.55 million current US$ | -16.5% |
| 2013 | 151.81 million current US$ | -3.0% |
| 2014 | 156.61 million current US$ | +3.2% |
| 2015 | 99.65 million current US$ | -36.4% |
| 2016 | 104.23 million current US$ | +4.6% |
| 2017 | 118.99 million current US$ | +14.2% |
| 2018 | 125.63 million current US$ | +5.6% |
| 2019 | 126.29 million current US$ | +0.5% |
| 2020 | 130.51 million current US$ | +3.3% |
| 2021 | 169.42 million current US$ | +29.8% |
| 2022 | 162.88 million current US$ | -3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 62.62 million current US$ | 5.63 million current US$ | 139.48 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 95.50 million current US$ | 69.50 million current US$ | 122.93 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 185.24 million current US$ | 142.15 million current US$ | 404.32 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 209.00 million current US$ | 158.56 million current US$ | 257.86 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 138.67 million current US$ | 99.65 million current US$ | 187.48 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 154.27 million current US$ | 130.51 million current US$ | 169.42 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Late-demographic dividend
- 24 Yemen 32.37 million current US$ compare
- 25 Colombia 30.02 million current US$ compare
- 26 Nigeria 28.74 million current US$ compare
- 27 Rwanda 28.71 million current US$ compare
- 28 Iraq 25.37 million current US$ compare
- 29 Georgia 21.93 million current US$ compare
- 30 Bosnia and Herzegovina 18.49 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Late-demographic dividend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 122.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 23.75 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 162.86 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.61 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 264.38 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.84 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.48 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.16 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 153.74 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -126.37 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Late-demographic dividend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Late-demographic dividend was 162.88 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Late-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 404.32 million current US$ in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Late-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.63 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does Late-demographic dividend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Late-demographic dividend ranks 27th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Late-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Late-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.