Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Middle income

Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 1.02 billion current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
1.02 billion current US$
Change on year
up 6.1%
Rank
9th
of 46 groups
All-time high
1.21 billion current US$
in 2006
All-time low
190,000 current US$
in 1960
Years of data
64
1960–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Middle income, 1960–2023

0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B196019912023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Middle income is 1.02 billion current US$, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.1% on the previous year and up 4.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Middle income peaked at 1.21 billion current US$ in 2006 and was at its lowest, 190,000 current US$, in 1960.

Middle income ranks 9th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Middle income, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled in Middle income, 1960 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
1960 190,000 current US$
1961 340,000 current US$ +78.9%
1962 1.57 million current US$ +361.8%
1963 5.05 million current US$ +221.7%
1964 10.24 million current US$ +102.8%
1965 13.35 million current US$ +30.4%
1966 14.72 million current US$ +10.3%
1967 16.10 million current US$ +9.3%
1968 25.25 million current US$ +56.8%
1969 35.64 million current US$ +41.1%
1970 36.41 million current US$ +2.2%
1971 48.41 million current US$ +33.0%
1972 78.58 million current US$ +62.3%
1973 111.33 million current US$ +41.7%
1974 179.37 million current US$ +61.1%
1975 309.26 million current US$ +72.4%
1976 304.53 million current US$ -1.5%
1977 367.51 million current US$ +20.7%
1978 345.10 million current US$ -6.1%
1979 465.00 million current US$ +34.7%
1980 479.41 million current US$ +3.1%
1981 395.59 million current US$ -17.5%
1982 389.02 million current US$ -1.7%
1983 345.77 million current US$ -11.1%
1984 336.85 million current US$ -2.6%
1985 326.68 million current US$ -3.0%
1986 482.24 million current US$ +47.6%
1987 441.45 million current US$ -8.5%
1988 522.18 million current US$ +18.3%
1989 686.28 million current US$ +31.4%
1990 660.52 million current US$ -3.8%
1991 765.49 million current US$ +15.9%
1992 913.62 million current US$ +19.4%
1993 783.87 million current US$ -14.2%
1994 685.08 million current US$ -12.6%
1995 639.04 million current US$ -6.7%
1996 789.24 million current US$ +23.5%
1997 647.48 million current US$ -18.0%
1998 478.77 million current US$ -26.1%
1999 533.60 million current US$ +11.5%
2000 612.50 million current US$ +14.8%
2001 530.61 million current US$ -13.4%
2002 502.15 million current US$ -5.4%
2003 632.46 million current US$ +26.0%
2004 779.92 million current US$ +23.3%
2005 839.42 million current US$ +7.6%
2006 1.21 billion current US$ +43.7%
2007 985.88 million current US$ -18.3%
2008 1.00 billion current US$ +1.6%
2009 913.89 million current US$ -8.8%
2010 869.27 million current US$ -4.9%
2011 996.64 million current US$ +14.7%
2012 915.42 million current US$ -8.1%
2013 975.79 million current US$ +6.6%
2014 911.41 million current US$ -6.6%
2015 750.82 million current US$ -17.6%
2016 776.29 million current US$ +3.4%
2017 906.01 million current US$ +16.7%
2018 925.94 million current US$ +2.2%
2019 840.31 million current US$ -9.2%
2020 872.69 million current US$ +3.9%
2021 1.03 billion current US$ +18.0%
2022 957.58 million current US$ -7.0%
2023 1.02 billion current US$ +6.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 12.25 million current US$ 190,000 current US$ 35.64 million current US$ 10
1970s 224.55 million current US$ 36.41 million current US$ 465.00 million current US$ 10
1980s 440.55 million current US$ 326.68 million current US$ 686.28 million current US$ 10
1990s 689.67 million current US$ 478.77 million current US$ 913.62 million current US$ 10
2000s 800.50 million current US$ 502.15 million current US$ 1.21 billion current US$ 10
2010s 886.79 million current US$ 750.82 million current US$ 996.64 million current US$ 10
2020s 969.05 million current US$ 872.69 million current US$ 1.03 billion current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Middle income

  1. 6 Somalia 73.80 million current US$ compare
  2. 7 Russian Federation 69.65 million current US$ compare
  3. 8 Sudan 59.98 million current US$ compare
  4. 9 Tanzania, United Republic of 55.91 million current US$ compare
  5. 10 Syrian Arab Republic 52.92 million current US$ compare
  6. 11 Republic of Moldova 49.29 million current US$ compare
  7. 12 South Sudan 49.28 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Middle income

All data for Middle income →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Middle income?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Middle income was 1.02 billion current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Middle income?
The highest recorded value was 1.21 billion current US$ in 2006.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Middle income?
The lowest recorded value was 190,000 current US$ in 1960.
How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
Middle income ranks 9th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Middle income?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Middle income data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Middle income. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/middle-income/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Middle income</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,726 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.