Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 0.0012 current US$ per person in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China, 1979–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
China recorded 0.0012 current US$ per person for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 19.9% on the previous year and down 85.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China peaked at 0.038 current US$ per person in 1989 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 current US$ per person, in 1979.
China ranks 140th of 142 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1979 | 0.0001 current US$ per person | — |
| 1981 | 0.0012 current US$ per person | +1178.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0002 current US$ per person | -79.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0006 current US$ per person | +136.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0008 current US$ per person | +29.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0108 current US$ per person | +1323.5% |
| 1986 | 0.0059 current US$ per person | -45.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0046 current US$ per person | -21.8% |
| 1988 | 0.0195 current US$ per person | +321.6% |
| 1989 | 0.038 current US$ per person | +94.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0281 current US$ per person | -26.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0083 current US$ per person | -70.4% |
| 1992 | 0.0266 current US$ per person | +219.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0301 current US$ per person | +13.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0147 current US$ per person | -51.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0127 current US$ per person | -13.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0146 current US$ per person | +14.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0055 current US$ per person | -62.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0083 current US$ per person | +49.5% |
| 1999 | 0.003 current US$ per person | -63.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0087 current US$ per person | +187.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0079 current US$ per person | -9.4% |
| 2002 | 0.005 current US$ per person | -36.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0048 current US$ per person | -4.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0141 current US$ per person | +195.3% |
| 2005 | 0.0077 current US$ per person | -45.2% |
| 2006 | 0.0091 current US$ per person | +17.6% |
| 2007 | 0.008 current US$ per person | -11.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0112 current US$ per person | +39.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0055 current US$ per person | -50.8% |
| 2010 | 0.0052 current US$ per person | -5.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0074 current US$ per person | +43.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0076 current US$ per person | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0082 current US$ per person | +7.2% |
| 2014 | 0.0024 current US$ per person | -70.7% |
| 2015 | 0.002 current US$ per person | -15.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0013 current US$ per person | -36.2% |
| 2017 | 0.0018 current US$ per person | +37.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0024 current US$ per person | +36.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0018 current US$ per person | -26.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0016 current US$ per person | -8.4% |
| 2021 | 0.0019 current US$ per person | +16.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0015 current US$ per person | -19.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0012 current US$ per person | -19.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0001 current US$ per person | 0.0001 current US$ per person | 0.0001 current US$ per person | 1 |
| 1980s | 0.0091 current US$ per person | 0.0002 current US$ per person | 0.038 current US$ per person | 9 |
| 1990s | 0.0152 current US$ per person | 0.003 current US$ per person | 0.0301 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0082 current US$ per person | 0.0048 current US$ per person | 0.0141 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.004 current US$ per person | 0.0013 current US$ per person | 0.0082 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0016 current US$ per person | 0.0012 current US$ per person | 0.0019 current US$ per person | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 137 Chile 0.0036 current US$ per person compare
- 138 Jamaica 0.0025 current US$ per person compare
- 139 Papua New Guinea 0.0018 current US$ per person compare
- 141 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.0007 current US$ per person compare
- 142 Turkmenistan 0 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China was 0.0012 current US$ per person in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.038 current US$ per person in 1989.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 current US$ per person in 1979.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- China ranks 140th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 85.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.