Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 0.1838 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China, 1979–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China is 0.1838 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 20.0% on the previous year and down 84.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China peaked at 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989 and was at its lowest, 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1979.
China ranks 134th of 141 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1979 | 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.1257 current US$ per square kilometre | +1211.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0266 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.8% |
| 1983 | 0.0639 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0841 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1985 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +1343.0% |
| 1986 | 0.6732 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.6% |
| 1987 | 0.5347 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1988 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +328.5% |
| 1989 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.7% |
| 1990 | 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1991 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.0% |
| 1992 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +223.5% |
| 1993 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1994 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.6% |
| 1995 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1996 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1997 | 0.7232 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 1998 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.0% |
| 1999 | 0.4058 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.8% |
| 2000 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +189.8% |
| 2001 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2002 | 0.6817 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.5% |
| 2003 | 0.654 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2004 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +197.1% |
| 2005 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.9% |
| 2006 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2007 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2008 | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.9% |
| 2009 | 0.7786 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.6% |
| 2010 | 0.7392 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2011 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 2012 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2013 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.3502 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.5% |
| 2015 | 0.2994 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2016 | 0.1923 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.8% |
| 2017 | 0.2656 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 2018 | 0.3629 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.6% |
| 2019 | 0.2683 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2020 | 0.2464 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2021 | 0.2866 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2022 | 0.2297 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 2023 | 0.1838 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1980s | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0266 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4058 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.654 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5827 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1923 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2366 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1838 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2866 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 131 Argentina 0.4253 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 132 Brazil 0.316 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 133 Nicaragua 0.2821 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Kazakhstan 0.1362 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 136 Uruguay 0.1351 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 137 Chile 0.0898 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in China was 0.1838 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0096 current US$ per square kilometre in 1979.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- China ranks 134th out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 84.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.