Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia recorded 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 22.7% on the previous year and up 180.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.3654 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1988.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 27th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0365 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.3416 current US$ per square kilometre | +835.0% |
| 1965 | 0.1169 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.8% |
| 1967 | 0.1589 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.9% |
| 1968 | -0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | -116.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0877 current US$ per square kilometre | -442.9% |
| 1970 | 0.1863 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.5% |
| 1971 | 0.4165 current US$ per square kilometre | +123.5% |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0.2082 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | -0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.2% |
| 1976 | -0.0548 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1977 | -0.0311 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.3% |
| 1978 | 0.0968 current US$ per square kilometre | -411.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0877 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1980 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +2362.5% |
| 1981 | 0.1078 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.0% |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1983 | -0.0457 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | -0.0073 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.0% |
| 1985 | -0.0676 current US$ per square kilometre | +825.0% |
| 1986 | -0.1187 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.7% |
| 1987 | -0.3654 current US$ per square kilometre | +207.7% |
| 1988 | -0.3654 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.1992 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 1990 | 0.1242 current US$ per square kilometre | -162.4% |
| 1991 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +1163.2% |
| 1992 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.0% |
| 1993 | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1994 | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1995 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.2% |
| 1996 | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1997 | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1998 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.7% |
| 1999 | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.6% |
| 2000 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 2001 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2002 | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2003 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2004 | 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 2005 | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 2006 | 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 2007 | 7.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2008 | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 7.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2010 | 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2011 | 7.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2012 | 6.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2013 | 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2014 | 6.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2015 | 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 2016 | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 5.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2018 | 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2019 | 6.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2020 | 6.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2021 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2022 | 13.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.0% |
| 2023 | 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0895 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3416 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.0853 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4165 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1098 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3654 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1242 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 24 Lithuania 111.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Estonia 108.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 El Salvador 104.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Mozambique 97.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Maldives 96.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Latvia 92.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Cambodia 91.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia was 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3654 current US$ per square kilometre in 1988.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 27th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 180.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.